English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Are we better off with afforable pricing since Ronald Reagan removed government control of gasoline pricing? Who is it favoring and why don't they allow Natural Gas and Electric companies raise prices as they see fit?

2007-05-11 10:09:19 · 9 answers · asked by samanthakhz 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

9 answers

Bush and Cheney - both pro oil.
Millions spent by the oil lobbies.

2007-05-11 10:12:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

-It's cheaper to run a vehicle with one person in it now with electricity than with gasoline. It all depends on what size vehicle you want; a metro or a Yukon. -Subsidies all depends on how far down the line you want to figure. Electricity is subsidized because the govt. (you) get to pay for millions of people that get sick from the pollution coal puts out when burnt. Oil is subsidized from tax breaks and military intervention in oil rich areas. -Current electricity production will have to go up very little. Coal powered plants burn pretty much the same amount of coal 24/7. They just don't have the turbines and generators working at night producing power since the demand for electricity falls so much at night. They could be producing power then easy enough to charge batteries- it's win/win for everyone then. -It's figured most batteries will have 200 miles per charge. Only once this year have I driven more than that in a day. I don't expect to do that again for a few years. If a person regularly has to drive more than that then they can get another battery pack installed in their vehicle. -Taxes would be a large additional cost, but lighter vehicles (electric) do much less damage to roads than heavier vehicles (ICE engines) do. The best part is i can make my own electricity at home with a few panels, a wind mill or the little stream going by my house.

2016-05-20 23:30:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If we could produce all of our gasoline in the US then government controls would have a lot more meaning. But when we import most of our gasoline which is bought on the open world market any price controls we want to put on the oil would be ineffective. The price of gasoline can be manipulated buy the oil companies but buy and large the price is driven more my speculation on the dangers of the world by the futures market. The futures market can drive up the price based on fears but it has been proven that it avoids the downfalls of crisis.

2007-05-13 12:39:37 · answer #3 · answered by Art Newbie Bill 3 · 2 0

"Gas & Water Socialism"

Early in the 20th Century, it became a popular idea that certain enterprises - like power and water distribution and telephone service - were 'natural monopolies' and were best either tightly regulated by the government, or outright nationalized.

That trend has become a widely held belief, a truism. (I pretty nearly believe it my self and I'm a neo-classicist.)

Furthermore, when the de-regulation of electricity was tried out in CA, it was implemented in such a byzantine way (the regulations, though they allowed some competition, actualy became more complex), that it was vulnerable to ruthless exploitation for profit. (Google ENRON for more.)

Thus, natural gas and electricity remain tightly regulated, while gasoline does not, and even though phone service has proven not to be a monopoly, natural or otherwise.

2007-05-11 10:33:56 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2 1

Because those are utilities, which oil companies aren't.

As a conservative, I have an issue with government asserting control over these things at all.

But often, huge industries actually seek government regulation because it tends to prevent competition and it ensures profit. I'll bet you didn't know that.

2007-05-11 10:15:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

that's a very good question! I'm against price controls for all things. as an aside, I see that "Just_Gone" couldn't help but to blame Bush for something that even Clinton didn't do anything about

2007-05-11 10:14:00 · answer #6 · answered by kapute2 5 · 1 0

Sure what not go to 6 bucks a gallon like they are doing in Europe.
That makes great sense.

2007-05-11 10:13:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Good Question.

2007-05-11 10:17:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

not only are bush and cheney pro oil... bush was and still is an oilman thats why he moved to texas...

2007-05-11 10:17:51 · answer #9 · answered by bobby_2_24 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers