English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does anyone aside from me hope that Hanoi Jane NEVER officiates a Yahoo question again?

2007-05-11 09:47:02 · 5 answers · asked by bnbn_e2 3 in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

The only difference is that Benedict Arnold is dead.

2007-05-11 09:55:11 · answer #1 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 0 0

AFAIK, Benedict's spouse grow to be a British Loyalist which I think of had a super effect on his terrific selection to betray the fledgling u . s .. by all money owed, Benedict grow to be a extremely clever guy and finished regular. i'm incredibly particular that he thoughtfully seen the implications of his selection and well-known those adverse aspects whilst he dedicated his treason. Jane Fonda grow to be a silly youthful woman, flush with the lack of expertise only somebody disconnected and insulated from certainty that residing a sheltered existence ought to furnish. with the aid of her movements she supported the demise of all US Servicemen possibly believing (properly no much less) that she could be insulated from the implications as she little doubt grow to be her entire existence. So, in answer on your question, Benedict Arnold's call grew to grow to be synonymous with treason interior the path of the passage of years. curiously that as we write our very own history, Jane's Fonda's call seems to be happening an identical revision. perhaps sometime interior the destiny, whilst one infant sees yet another fall off a swing injuring themselves and that youngster steps around to get on the swing fairly than help, their friends will call the witness "Hanoi Jane", somebody who places their very own desires above the protection and well being of others.

2016-10-15 09:57:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

He was a traitor who devised a scheme that would have allowed the British to control the Hudson Valley and split the colonies.

She was a stupid girl who posed for a stupid picture.

And as far as her not apologizing? This is what she said:

I would like to say something, not just to Vietnam veterans in New England, but to men who were in Vietnam, who I hurt, or whose pain I caused to deepen because of things that I said or did. I was trying to help end the killing and the war, but there were times when I was thoughtless and careless about it and I'm very sorry that I hurt them. And I want to apologize to them and their families. [...] I will go to my grave regretting the photograph of me in an anti-aircraft gun, which looks like I was trying to shoot at American planes. It hurt so many soldiers. It galvanized such hostility. It was the most horrible thing I could possibly have done. It was just thoughtless."

2007-05-11 09:57:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The difference between Jane Fonda and Benedict Arnold is that years later he was regretful of his treasonous actions.

She's a fool. That was a dumb question, and it was just a plug for her stupid movie.

2007-05-11 09:52:29 · answer #4 · answered by chumley 4 · 1 2

she never ran the Military Acadamy.

2007-05-12 09:21:34 · answer #5 · answered by sirbobby98121 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers