What percentage of DNA does a human share with a banana?

Answer 1

I'm looking down me pants and it's about 5%

Answer 2

one million. confident, all residing issues proportion a undemanding ancestor. the main up-tp-date undemanding ancestor of people and bananas lived greater advantageous than 2 billion years in the past. Your "undemanding sense" is outfitted on your adventure with nicely-known events and gadgets and a time scale of not a quantity hundred years. you're actually not conscious of differences in gene frequency over the years scales of 1000's of hundreds of thousands of years. 2. Your remark approximately "small minded evolutionist" seems to be an attempt to stereotype human beings. If this is a habit with you, it is beneficial to be greater careful interior the destiny. 3. you have at a loss for words evolution with abiogenesis. The question of ways life arose has not something even if to do with evolution. 4. Morphological and anatomical similarities of residing varieties are in basic terms one line of information for evolution. the different 3 crucial lines are biogeography, genetics, and the fossil checklist. once you have thoroughly studied those disciplines, you would be in a greater effective place to refute Darwin and the tens of 1000's of adult adult males and ladies who've committed their lives over the final a hundred and fifty years to gaining understanding of ways the residing international got here to be because it is. 5. What do you're making of a better intelligence that creates species with maximum of flaws? as an occasion, in guy the recurrent laryngeal nerve descends from the concepts, bypasses its purpose organ, the larynx, enters the chest, wraps around the aorta, and then ascends returned into the neck the place it reaches the larynx. This association is organic nonsense till you talk approximately the posterior circulate of the main significant blood vessel that trapped the laryngeal nerve at the back of it and at last grew to alter into the aorta in guy. Clue: you comprehend extremely under you think of you do. instruct your self, or come across a school to do it.

Answer 3

Actually, I think that a human shares either 50% or 60% of its DNA with a banana.

Answer 4

About 50% to 60%.

And for Pete's sake, why do people misinterpret this in a childlike way to mean we are "50%-banana"? Why don't they do even the slightest bit of research to understand what this means?

That doesn't mean that there is or ever was something that *looks* like half-banana/half-human! Not all your DNA is what you *look* like. Most DNA is involved in production of proteins, enzymes for creating or breaking down sugars, for building cellular structures and processes, etc. etc.

Heck, the structure of the hemoglobin pigment (a protein) in animal blood has a lot of common code with the structure of the chlorophyll pigment in plants. That doesn't mean that we have some chlorophyll or plants have some hemoglobin. It means that the same basic molecule structure was basically readapted for two very different functions.

And it's not just the similarities, but the precise differences within those areas of similarity that points to ancestry. If there is a common sequence in the DNA of two organisms, but that sequence has a specific "typo" in location 123 .. then we can trace common relationships and branches by finding other organisms that have the same typo in the same location 123 of that same sequence.

And finally a lot of DNA has no function at all ... literally called "junk DNA." These are carryovers from common ancestors between the two organisms ... going right back to bits and pieces that are useful in even more elemental organisms.

It's this junk DNA that's really a tell-tale sign of common ancestry. Why else would there be common sequences of base-pairs in the DNA, that are present in both species, but serves no function in either species?

Answer 5

We're 60% the same as bananas.
Humans have about 30,000 genes. (which sounds like a lot, until you discover that chickens have about 23,000 and an ear of corn has 59,000!)
Our genetic code is also similar to other life forms. For example, we're 90% identical to most mammals. But between two humans, there's only 0.01% difference. So this means that your brother (or dad) is 99.9% the same as Albert Einstein!
We're also 70% the same (genetically) as slugs and 98.5% the same as chimps! :)

Answer 6

From http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/GENEALOGY-DNA/2005-01/1106711681

We share half our genes with the banana
Robert May is a UK Chief Scientist. In New Scientist magazine (July 1, 2000)
on page 5 he stated, "We share half our genes with the banana." One can only
guess (with a fertile imagination) what the common ancestor between people
and bananas looked like! In addition, there are fish that have 40% the same
DNA as people, but hopefully no evolutionist would claim that the fish are
40% human - or people are half bananas.

Answer 7

This site says 60%
http://www.makingthemodernworld.org.uk/stories/defiant_modernism/01.ST.02/?scene=6&tv=true

Answer 8

Ive heard this before, isn't there a high percentage of d.n.a. with a daffodil too

Answer 9

According to the following, 50%:
"Recent research shows just 2.5% of DNA is different between people and mice, and only 1% different from a chimpanzee.6 A UK chief scientist said, "We share half our genes [DNA] with the banana."7
6. Mural, R.J., et al., Science, v. 296, May 31, 2002, p. 1661.
7. May, R., Quoted in Coglan & Boyce, New Scientist 167 (July 1):5, 2000"

http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=459

Answer 10

At a certain level of divergence (which has definitely been reached between humans and bannanas), this question becomes both unanswerable and unimportant. I defy anyone to produce a meaningful sequence alignment between a large region of bannana DNA and a corresponding region of human DNA.

Answer 11

50%