face it. If he will lie to get us to go to war in Iraq, why wouldn't he lie about a terrorist attack on Fort Dix?????
2007-05-11 08:50:39 · 24 answers · asked by Frednok 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
OK retard. These guys were MORE RADICAL ISLAMICS. That's what radical Islamics want to do, kill infidels. Unless you are a Muslim, and believe as they believe as they believe, you are a target. You are too ignorant to live and I hope you get a Darwin Award soon, before you can reproduce. If you think Bush lied, then both of the Clinton's, Kerry, and all those democrackheads lied too. They looked at EXACTLY the same evidence as Bush did. Bill Clinton stated that Iraq was a danger WAY before Bush could have manufactured any evidence.
BY THE WAY, there is no "scandal" with the firings of the 8 attorneys, because the president can fire ANY OF THEM FOR ANY REASON AT ANY TIME.
Clinton fired ALL of them when he was elected, including ones that were investigating him in Arkansas.
2007-05-11 09:01:47 · answer #1 · answered by mgentryholt 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You've got a good point there but like one person said that would take a lot of intelligence something people say bush doesn't have but on second thought look at all he's done already and gotten away with so far. man might be smarter than we give him credit for. I mean like you said the man has publicly lied cheated and stole from our government and hes still in the oval office serving his stolen term as president and it takes a pretty smart man to pull that off. also one guy said it would really sink his approval if he Did and got caught look at the approval now think the man really cares if it go down. he's gonna be kicked back drinking margaritas and drawing that retirement check that comes out of the peoples back pocket in a couple of year weather he has a 15 or a 85 approval
2007-05-11 16:13:11 · answer #2 · answered by goodins2 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why would the president of the united states stoop to do an act that if discovered would place him and jail for the rest of his life during his second term as president. So lets see which choice should i make as president: Live the rest of life on pay from the goverment with secret service protection or jail? President Bush has a proven track record of running the country the way he thinks it should be run not the way the ever-changing poll numbers think it should be run. If you want a prez who runs a country based on poll numbers and leaves the mess for the next administration(dem or rep) to clean up that would be clinton.
2007-05-11 16:00:46 · answer #3 · answered by scriben8 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm not a Bush fan anymore than the next guy, but that sounds ridiculas. His poll numbers shouldn't go up for stopping a terrorist attack because that's the government's job. Preventing the attack, from me, only gets a "Thanks guys for doing your job." If he were to say, stop world terrorism from ever happening again, then I'd "approve" of his ability to do his job, thus the approval ratings would go up.
2007-05-11 15:57:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it was a long-term hoax started when the terrorists illegally entered the US through Mexico in the 1980s. All Bush had to do was run for president, win twice, and activate this sleeper cell! Simple! Just like you, simple!
2007-05-11 15:55:03 · answer #5 · answered by Bombadil 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Another group of idiots they caught "in the planning stage" who had no weapons.
What 6 people in their right mind would attack a military base? That shows they have at least the same IQ as Bush!
Lets catch someone who at least has access to weapons!
Remember the 6 idiots in the warehouse! They are stupid, and is that the best they can catch. How about ferreting out a few cells. They can't do that!
Run up the flag, and the gas prices!
2007-05-11 15:57:26 · answer #6 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
He's a lame duck President who will likely be replaced by a Democrat- he's seriously going to face jail over something that does him NO good when he's got less than a year to retirement ??
2007-05-12 22:27:16 · answer #7 · answered by Kit W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe this situation was completely true, however Americans have a habit of forgetting things so we need little reminders of why we need homeland security.
They attacked us in 1993 and then again in 2001 look we let our guard down and see what happens millions of people were affected and we have to protect ourselfs, without becoming a police country.
2007-05-11 16:03:06 · answer #8 · answered by Thomas Smith 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
When one has lost the trust of the people such as Bush has we are all tempted to view everything he does with a great deal of suspicion.
2007-05-14 16:32:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I really do not think anyone would lie about this! I am not a fan of President Bush, but I really don't think anyone could make this up. Besides, he was not the one who discovered/uncovered the six, it was a civilian/consumer just like us...
2007-05-11 16:02:44 · answer #10 · answered by ladyflacelt 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋