who were arrested in New Jersey? They were denied bail. Does that upset you? Some of you say they were too dumb to pull off an attack. Do you think the judge should have been more lenient?
2007-05-11 08:31:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think they should be subjected to sleeping with my ex-wife! They'll beg to be executed, after that!
2007-05-11 15:04:21 · answer #1 · answered by Nunya Bidniss 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bail is not a constitutional right, it is accepted or denied based on what kind of danger the person would post on the society or country.
No one will rush to the aid, since they were afforded the right to a trial, which is all most of us ask for, since that is what the US Constitution stands for.
2007-05-11 15:38:42 · answer #2 · answered by Roy 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
As a staunch liberal, privacy advocate, and defender of all freedoms, I strongly support the denial of bail (assuming that there is some merit to the charges, which supposedly the judge should have examined). It's just makes practical sense that, given the crimes they are accused of, that they should be kept in jail until trial.
2007-05-11 15:36:05 · answer #3 · answered by Qwyrx 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The Democrats have given as much aid as they
can to all terrorists by asking our nation to surrender.
(that makes terrorists the winners, right?) No, the
judge in NJ should not have been more lenient. What's
the matter with you anyway? Turn them loose and maybe
they'll succeed on their next try......is that what you want?
If so, you must be a right wing liberal.
2007-05-11 15:36:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Not me. They should be denied bail so they won't leave the country and do their dirty deeds somewhere else.
The judge was not too lenient.
2007-05-11 15:37:41 · answer #5 · answered by Sean 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
It's not so much aiding them as it is making sure they're 'for real' terrorists and not another group among the 85% percent of accused terrorists who turned out not to be, so far.
And, they are too dumb - making one suspicious about whether they're just a distraction to keep us from finding the real terrorists.
And, unlike the students in Virginia, the soldiers at Fort Dix could have defended themselves - that's another dumb thing about this supposed plot.
2007-05-11 15:38:00 · answer #6 · answered by Ben 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Persons are held over for trial without bail all the time. Why are you making a moot point?
2007-05-11 15:36:59 · answer #7 · answered by wisdomforfools 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They would have to get around Rosie O's monumental a.s.s first. Otherwise, the liberals who support her and terrorists will just have to form a line.
2007-05-11 16:05:08 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think its safe to say that this Fort Dix thing is apolitical. NO ONE will say the judge should have been more lenient.
2007-05-11 15:35:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
They are TERRORISTS. They admitted to wanting to "kill as many armymen as possible." They should NOT get bail,
2007-05-11 15:34:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋