English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

a. Buffon

b. Lyell

c. Wallace

d. Cuvier

e. Darwin

2007-05-11 06:41:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Biology

6 answers

-Buffon was a French naturalist.
-Lyell was a Geologist
-Wallace was a naturalist, explorer, geographer, anthropologist and biologist.
-Cuvier was a French naturalist and Zoologist.
-Darwin was a English naturalist

2007-05-11 09:36:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

B) Charles Lyell was a geologist, not a biologist.

On the other hand, the following were all biologists: Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon; Alfred Russel Wallace; Georges Cuvier; and Charles Darwin. However, scientists in the field were typically called "naturalists" during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

For some reason, several people here have said that Cuvier is not the name of a biologist. But, to reiterate, Georges Cuvier (1769-1832) was a noted biologist. He was instrumental in the development of the field of comparative anatomy, and he demonstrated conclusively for the first time that animals could become extinct; previously, it was widely believed that every species that had ever existed was still in existence, because God's creation was perfect.

2007-05-11 06:47:46 · answer #2 · answered by DavidK93 7 · 0 1

Lyell was not a biologist. He was a geologist. Cuvier became known as the father of comparative anatomy, a field of biology.

Actually, in their own day, none of the above were referred to as "biologists." They were all known (including Lyell) as "natural philosphers."

2007-05-11 09:08:29 · answer #3 · answered by Dendronbat Crocoduck 6 · 1 0

d. Cuvier

2007-05-11 06:48:42 · answer #4 · answered by krazy chick 3 · 0 1

d. Cuvier

2007-05-11 06:46:31 · answer #5 · answered by JuicyGirl 4 · 0 1

..d.

2007-05-11 07:57:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers