why we can't just go into Iraq and bomb the whole place. if we try to pick out the bad guys it's not gona work

Answer 1

Because genocide is a war crime.

Answer 2

How would you like it if a foreign country sent troops to do that to your country? And please don't defend it by saying terrorists attacked America. The truth is that only a small group of misguided people did that, not a whole nation of people.

The sad thing about war is that people tend to forget that it's not just about "bad guys." It's about the innocent people who suffer or perish because they have no control over the irresponsible decisions that their leaders make. How do you think it would feel to be in your home at night with your family and hear artillery tanks and fighter planes attacking while you and your children cower in a corner?

Apparently you've bought all the lies that the Bush administration told. There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the 9/11 terrorists were not Iraqis, Iraqi people never asked anyone to instill democracy in their country, and Osama has not been captured as the US government had promised.

Stop and think. Your idea is a heartless one. Those people are not all a bunch of terrorists. They too, are thinking, feeling human beings. I pray for them every night the same way I pray for Americans and for myself.

Answer 3

The UN merely wrote that determination because of the fact we twisted their arm and that they knew we've been going to circulate without or with their approval. Going into Iraq became our thought. Iran is a much better, extra complicated, and extra advantageous armed united states of america than Iraq ever became. Bombing it could have accidental wider consequences. and incredibly, the purpose of the UN is to ward off bombing and destroying different international places, loopy!!! ;) they're incredibly a lot anti-conflict except there's no different option. the full difficulty became began to ward off international conflict III. so a techniques, so solid...

Answer 4

I think it would look GREAT to the rest of the world.

Picking out the bad guys will work, but it's gonna take a while. Also, when we're done picking out the "bad guys", we will then soon have antother ally in the war on terrorism.

If we bomb the place, there wouldn't be an ally, and the rest of the world would hate us.

Answer 5

That is a horrific attitude. Clearly you know very little about this so called "war". So many innocent people killed and maimed and here you are acting like life doesn't matter. Shame on you. Grow up and get some education and some morals.

Answer 6

Because we cant abuse the power that the United States has. Then we look to be a bully. We aren't fighitng Iraq....we are fighting terrorism. Splinter cells that are not associated with their country, but are fighting because of stupid radical islamic beliefs.

I always thought that to de-moralize the terrorists, we should drop millions of Bibles on Iraq...

Answer 7

I guess that solves one problem. Actually, why don't we just bomb the entire world. If you were the only person left, you would be certain that 100% of the terrorists were dead. Flawless logic!

Answer 8

So, according to your logic, it would be OK to bomb the whole of Atlanta because it has a high crime rate?

Answer 9

There was this agreement called the Genova Convention, that basically made it a war crime to do what you mentioned. It's an un-humane and an idiotic suggestion.

Answer 10

Why would anyone say it is better to kill innocent people. If you had to choose which babies to kill and them kill them yourself rather than having someone else do it, could you. If so, aren't you as evil the terrorist in Iraq killing innocent people. It is sad you have lost your humanity.

Answer 11

Because all the "bad guys" aren't in one single place. They dodge and dart behind the innocent.