English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The way that we have so completely destroyed the economy of Iraq is nothing short of criminal!

How could Karl Rove have been so successful in manipulating so many good people to vote for such a terrible president?!!

How did we get so completely fooled in this day and age?

What a masterful devil Karl Rove must be to trick the American electorate into participating in the Bush/Cheney war crimes!!!

2007-05-11 04:11:04 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

17 answers

I get the feeling that there are a lot fewer people today that will admit voting for "W" than actually did vote for him.

The strategy of Karl Rove is the "50% + 1" strategy. Promise the world to those people and you will win and who cares about the rest. Unfortunately, when you win with those slim majorities, it doesn't give you much room for error in case your candidate turns out to be a buffoon. Case in Point: GW Bush.

2007-05-11 04:20:37 · answer #1 · answered by Wayne Z 7 · 0 2

Considering the lousy, treasonous opposition, no. If the Democrat Party wants my vote, they have to do several things to even begin being considered:

1) They have to repudiate the radical left. Ignore them, don't give those people the time of day.

2) They have to come up with an alternative way to fight the war on terror. Leaving Iraq or Afghanistan before the job is done is absolutely unacceptable.

3) Recognize that everyone has the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", and work to get abortion outlawed.

That's to even start. They'd have to also get right on several other economic and social issues to even deserve a vote.

2007-05-11 04:35:12 · answer #2 · answered by WinOne4TheGipper 3 · 0 0

Rove is a political genius. He should never be underestimated, and that is exactly the mistake that the democrats made in both elections. They saw Bush's cute little scripted gaffes and stupid things, and played right into his hands by thinking he was stupid. They spent their time laughing at his pre-planned mistakes and "bad grammar" and whatnot, and he turned around and kicked their asses both times.

"Even if your enemy is the size of an ant, see in him an elephant"

Thats some common sense the Democrats could really use. When you underestimate people like Bush and Rove, theyre going to end up winning.

2007-05-11 04:37:47 · answer #3 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 0 0

Many people in Europe knew that Hussein had no atomic weapons. Peter Scholl-Latour, a german reporter, who is an expert about oriental politics warned several times before the invading of Iraq and before the negative consequences of the war.
Were the secret services of the USA asleep? Or doesn't G.W. Bush listen to serious experts the USA certainly have?

2007-05-11 06:08:28 · answer #4 · answered by Jean 4 · 0 0

I did vote for him, the two situations. I did this final time by fact i did no longer choose a metamorphosis of president-deliver in the process the conflict. I did although think of that we'd be out of there by now. i assumed that it would provide the incorrect effect to those that are watching the U. S. from the exterior. he's our president, i do no longer could believe him on all his suggestions, and that i do no longer, yet i do no longer think of that Kerry might've been any further effective. It grow to be quite the lesser of two evils this final time, in my view. and that i do merely in comparison to Kerry, I observed him in individual at a fundraiser, and he gave me the creeps, and the spouse...I merely won't bypass there.

2016-10-15 09:19:31 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I am still happy to have voted for President Bush. If the economy of Iraq is as bad as you say, that is not his doing. It was messed up when Adolph Hussein was in. If the Iraqi people decide to get rid of the terrorists that are now in their country, they will find that their economy will begin to grow.

2007-05-11 04:16:08 · answer #6 · answered by †Lawrence R† 6 · 5 0

No, definately not. He is a leader and leaders make unpopular decisions. Popularity is not important. Our security is. Look at Wall Street also. Remember only 30% of the population was in favor of the revolutionary war.

2007-05-11 05:00:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, I voted for 2000 and I later regretted it. I didn't vote at all in 2004.

But don't hold your breath in anticipation of thinking that I am going to endorse your views, either. I am not going to get into Rove-bashing. I am not going to belittle all of the people who voted for Bush. I am not disgruntled with Bush for the reason you hate him and hate Rove.

Rove is to Bush what Carville is to Clinton.

2007-05-11 04:24:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Sounds like another liberal crying "No Fair!"

I do have remorse, remorse that cowardly Liberals are too busy crying to wipe their asses with more than a single sheet of toilet paper.

Here's an idea, sparky...Get a LIFE, Get a JOB, just GET LOST!

2007-05-11 04:29:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, I voted for him the first time around and I deeply regret my vote. I had his number in 2004 though and my vote is one he did not get. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

2007-05-11 05:26:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers