I heard Michael Savage yesterday say.(I recorded it)
"The conservative movement is dead, I am a Nationalist, ...I am a Nationalist" "Multi Culturalism has failed, the united states comes from the best of Anglo descent, not the middle east, not Africa.. but Europe's white and best...Individualism in the extreme is narcissism, You should be loyal to the "state" above all else", "The enemy abroad is Islamofascism, the enemy at home is the ACLU, The Labor Unions, and all the Anti American terrorist sympathizers, ....I am a Nationalist"..
Now for anyone that hasn't read their 20th century history, that is the exact same verbiage that Hitler, Stalin and Mao's propagandists used... they too feigned various political ideologies before drawing "that" line in the sand.. Michael Savage is broadcast on over 370 stations around this country
Is the Right beginning to morph into the fascist party?
2007-05-11 03:38:58 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes he said .. that Nationalism in it's extreme can be dangerous, as with the Nazi s etc... but he immediately went back to.. I'm a nationalist.. so are you insinuating that it's Ok to be a little bit Nazi in your thinking, you just can't take it to far??????
2007-05-11 03:53:55 · update #1
the right winger is a weiner not a savage!
Facist USA....RIP
2007-05-11 06:45:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No , the right is not beginning to morph into the fascist party . And Savage is a talk-show host, so he doesn't speak for everyone, just his opinion . Some of what he said is true though. . . .. specifically that Individualism in the extreme is narcissism . . . . .
2007-05-11 03:57:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're somewhat of an alarmist in thinking that today's "right" is morphing into a fascist party. However, Michael Savage's bottom line is simply, preserving the language, borders and culture of the English speaking people of the United States.
His opinions are not politically correct and make him vulnerable to the likes of extreme liberals who would label him an insensitive racist pig. It's just not fashionable these days to be pro-American and support traditional family values. We are living in the hedonistic age of the culture of death.
2007-05-11 03:51:56 · answer #3 · answered by soulguy85 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i do no longer understand why maximum liberals who declare to comprehend the form opt to close down human beings on the radio. i've got on no account in my existence encountered a radio that had a minimum of two dials on it, one to coach the channel and the different that turns it off. i do no longer pay attention to Savage, yet have interior the previous and located him to be exciting. I easily did no longer believe each and every thing he stated. I easily do no longer agree along with his remark approximately autistic young ones. yet he does have the terrific suited to declare those issues, merely as we've a desirable to opt to no longer pay attention. If sufficient human beings opt to no longer pay attention, Then the Michael Savage practice is going away. unfastened speech is unfastened speech and could be secure. Hurting human beings's emotions isn't a reason to eliminate their first ammendment rights. greater radio human beings have lost their jobs over "outrage" by one team or yet another. Don Imus harm somebody's emotions, he had to bypass. sometimes you get your feeling harm. Be thick skinned and recover from it.
2016-10-15 09:16:33 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all let me say Michael Savage is foul mouth creep and if he ever though he was a consevative he has has head screwed on backwards.
He is a hate monger and after listening to him for 10 minutes decided he does not speak for any conservatives, or any right wingers, except those that base their political views only on hate.
The converative movement is only dead in his eyes and I glad he no longer uses the term in his radio show.
2007-05-11 03:46:54 · answer #5 · answered by Tapestry6 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Is that the same Michael "Savage" who used to pal around with Allen Ginsberg and Timothy Leary? I think he's just another aging wannabe Imus, trying opportunistically to grab his fifteen minutes of fame and make it pay. It's just acting, so it probably appeals to the lunatic fringe who take him seriously as well as the Neanderthals who enjoy that kind of comedy. So-called "moderates" like Bush can do a lot more real harm than so-called "extremists" like what's-his-name.
2007-05-11 03:53:57 · answer #6 · answered by RE 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Michael Savage's real name is Michael Weiner. Enough said.
2007-05-11 03:42:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Consevative movement is not dead, Savage does not speak for me or many other people. He speaks for himself. When were Stalin and Mao Fascist? I thought they were Communist. So no, the Right is not turning into a fascist party, the left is coming closer and closer to the Communist Party though.
2007-05-11 03:49:11 · answer #8 · answered by Chase 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Michael Savage is a satirist and he is playing the extreme right in this country in order to line his pockets with the money they would otherwise be spending on lottery tickets.
2007-05-11 03:41:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
What?
Where was the usual salutation when Hitler speaks?
WHY CAN'T PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS ONLY 1 RACE: HUMAN.
Clearly Gerbbles is not dead....
Only a FAR left wing liberal (actually RIGHT WING COMMUNIST) Democrat would say such things. Is that you Hitlary?
2007-05-11 03:56:37 · answer #10 · answered by Jimbobby2753 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mike Savage is a bag of (feminine hygiene product).
2007-05-11 03:42:56 · answer #11 · answered by truthspeaker10 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋