hes an idiot
2007-05-11 01:51:07 · 11 answers · asked by willy w 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yep...armold was an awesome leader...probably one of the best in history.
Question is....wonder if you knew your were complimenting Bush.
2007-05-11 01:58:19 · answer #1 · answered by Q-burt 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Being a President and being a General are two completely different things, so you question is basically, to put it bluntly, moronic.
Unlike the lameass Kerry, Bush never claimed to be a great military strategist. But that's not the president's job, anyways. However, in the overall conduct of foreign policy, military conflict can and does occur. Bush's job as president is to determine if it is in our national interest to pursue a military solution to a foreign policy objective.
It is the job of the Defense Department to determine the military strategies and tactics.
Even Bush knows this. And if he's an "idiot", what does that make you?
2007-05-11 02:23:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I certainly have been deployed by 3 diverse presidents. Bush I, Clinton and Bush II. I supported each and every a sort of presidents on an identical time as they have been in place of work. the countless conflicts I participated in I observed a purpose for and a few i did no longer. some conflicts we finished and others like Kosovo and Iraq we nevertheless have troops in contact in. maximum persons won't undesirable mouth our commander in chief merely as we will not question the regulations put in place by the duly elected representatives of the yank human beings. Privately maximum persons wish that we would be allowed to end the pastime that we've began and that we will no longer taken care of as poorly by fact the returning veterans of the Vietnam conflict have been taken care of by those greater enlightened than us dumb grunts.
2016-10-15 09:05:26 · answer #3 · answered by lishego 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, Benedict Arnold played a great role in winning the Revolutionary War. His contributions in the early part of the war kept the British from winning a quick and decisive victory.
Unfortunately, he fell victim to the philosophy of the Democrats and Harry Reids of the time who declared defeat and decided to surrender to the other side.
2007-05-11 02:06:06 · answer #4 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Lol Benedict Arnold was actually an excellent military leader...
2007-05-11 01:54:38 · answer #5 · answered by John L 5 · 7⤊ 1⤋
That would be an insult to Benedict Arnold. Here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedict_Arnold look at all the great things Benedict Arnold did before you compare him to Bush.
2007-05-11 02:01:32 · answer #6 · answered by steve 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. Benedict Arnold was a competent general before he becamea traitor. Bush, on tdhe other hand, is just a trator.
2007-05-11 02:15:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush isn't a traitor, Kerry, Murtha, Pelosi, and Reid are
2007-05-11 02:21:10 · answer #8 · answered by DeuceRider 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
George Walker Bush was never qualified for the job of President in the first place as he is more a puppet for VP Dickless Cheney and the rest of his cowards from the PNAC.
2007-05-11 02:08:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
So do you have some solutions or do you just want to call people names?
2007-05-11 01:59:32 · answer #10 · answered by sfavorite711 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋