English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What are some reasons to put term limits on Representatives and Senators???

2007-05-11 01:01:59 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

5 answers

None. People have the right to vote for anyone they wish. In the latest Congressional election, a major campaign was launched to get rid of one of the biggest a***s in the House: namely, Jack Murtha. He won re-election. If his constituents are satisfied to have the idiot represent them, we others just have to live with it.

2007-05-11 01:07:43 · answer #1 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2 0

I don't think Representatives and Senators should have term limits.


It's different for the President, because they're at the most powerful single position in the government. The Executive Branch is a one-man show.

However, the Legislative Branch is a 500+ man show. Except for the Speaker of the House, and Majority/Minority leaders, no one person has a bigger say over someone else.


We elect in Senators for 6 years to Represent us. We elect a Representative for 2 years to Represent us. We elect a President for 4 years to lead us. Why put term limits on people who represent you?

2007-05-11 07:46:07 · answer #2 · answered by Jeremiah 5 · 0 0

term limits are pronounced as elections. human beings vote them in and vote them out. And that is a lot distinctive between the place of work of the President and the physique of Congress, once you're talking approximately term limits. The President is one guy or woman. he's the administrative branch. That branch of the government is a one guy practice. Congress is the Legislative branch, composed of 500+ human beings. different than for the Speaker of the living house and Majority/Minority leaders, no person guy or woman has a much better say. human beings pick Congress human beings merely like they do Presidents, confident. however the President as one holds extra power than Congress as persons.

2017-01-09 15:37:09 · answer #3 · answered by porco 4 · 0 0

Here is the problem. All elected officials have as their number one project to get themselves reelected. They do so by "bringing jobs to the district" that translates to pork barrel money from the fed. They are subject to corruption, and spend our money on useless projects for each other so everyone gets money to help their reelection. Power corrupts and total power corrupts totally. The founders of the country never envisioned lifetime representatives. Their service was a burden to them today it is a lifetime of perks and money.

2007-05-11 02:52:47 · answer #4 · answered by lestermount 7 · 0 0

None. We don't need term limits - we have terms. If a majority of voters want to send the person back, that's democracy. If they don't, all they have to do is vote him out.

2007-05-11 02:12:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers