A safe relationship with no fights,but no passion.Or a deep, passionate bond with more fights than usual??
2007-05-09 20:10:31 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
If I had to choose, I'd say the one with passion. A passion-less marriage would be AGONY to me.
2007-05-09 20:28:53 · answer #1 · answered by judy bo-booty 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's easy, I'll take the passion with the fights. All couple bicker, it's the Making-Up part that's the best.
If you have a bond, you should be able to communicate your needs in and out of the bedroom.
Very few people have this kind of relationship. It takes work and a lot of prayer.
It is worth it because when the passion is there, it is ohh soo sweet.
2007-05-10 03:47:24 · answer #2 · answered by ellymom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A safe one with no passion. Fights are bad for long relationships. Anyways, I don't believe passions will last.
2007-05-10 11:48:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is a tough one, but I think I would have to choose the deep, passionate bond with more fights than usual.
If I knew we were really bonded and that we truly were passionate about each other, I could make it through the fights.
A safe relationship with no fights would be nice, but if there was no passion, it would eventually get boring.
2007-05-10 03:29:11 · answer #4 · answered by animal lover 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would definitely choose a deep, passionate bonding marriage, although I think it's important to pick and choose your battles when dealing with fights. A "safe" marriage is one that doesn't grow and stays stagnant.
2007-05-10 03:56:31 · answer #5 · answered by Aurora 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A safe relationship with no fights.
I've lived in a house in which my parents fought non-stop and I know how exhausting and upsetting it can be.
To those who think they want passion over peace, try living with a couple like that.
2007-05-10 04:11:20 · answer #6 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I mix of both, but in my case I have more the passion, fighting side. I noticed that if there is not excitement, I get bore and I think that could create problems for some people.
2007-05-10 04:07:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are possibilities of having both, passionate and safe relationship with no fight.
2007-05-10 03:56:33 · answer #8 · answered by Bigguy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither... Hold out for a passionate reslationship that is safe because you are both secure in the feelings you have for each other. Every relationship will have its arguements, but people who really love each other, put their spouse/partner before them and don't seem to fight over trivial things, because they "get" each other, which relates back to your qouted "deep passion" or love for each other. You will know when it is right, you will love every stupid quirk they have, can't imagine another place you would rather be than with them (years into the relationship) You couldn't imagine respecting or admiring anyone more. You hold them in the highest regard, and adore them, and their flaws... etc. etc.
2007-05-10 03:34:30 · answer #9 · answered by Wendy B 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
a passionate, some fighting is good as long as know one gets hurt. But on the same hand that get old. I don't know slow and steady wins the race.
2007-05-10 04:35:55 · answer #10 · answered by collectivetheresa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That depends on the person I choose. Take my example, I am married and I have been fighting with my partner even months before our mariage and it continues still today. But the fact is, we reconcile very shortly. It's good to fight, provided if you can reconcile very soon. Actually it strengthens the bond between persons in mariage. So I prefer the second one, frequent fights with immediate reconcilation.
2007-05-10 05:35:01 · answer #11 · answered by Atique 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋