English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

if there was a big bang... what made that... it has to be God.

2007-05-09 12:29:11 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Physics

9 answers

If you can explain where God came from, then I'll accept your augment. Just saying God is eternal is no more logical than the "big band" theory, and who's God are we talking about anyway?

2007-05-09 12:40:44 · answer #1 · answered by tinkertailorcandlestickmaker 7 · 0 0

The big bang theories are extreme extrapolations back in time. The more extreme the extrapolation, the higher the risk of being wrong. To extrapolate beyond a big bang is nowhere near scientifically reasonable or sensible.

The intersecting brane idea is just a conjecture. String and membrane theories are being worked on, frantically. But as yet, there is no complete theory, much less an accepted theory. Even if one is eventually developed, and is successful at making predictions, it just pushes the question back a little further. Where did the membranes or the strings come from?

The Bible has proved correct in every respect in which it can be, and has been, tested. It's logical to expect that the message in its first verse is correct also. "God created the heavens and the earth." The message really isn't about how. Do you think Moses' audience could understand 11-dimensional mathematical constructs?

To require that God be physical to create a physical universe is meaningless. Creation by God is not a scientific fact or even a scientific argument. When you're asking how mass, energy, time, space, and physical laws came to be, the answer can't be those same entities.

Of course, no one can prove God created. But neither can we disprove it. And we don't have any other answer. It's not science to reject that possibility just because you don't like it.

2007-05-09 18:27:01 · answer #2 · answered by Frank N 7 · 0 0

The theory of the big bang was based first on the observation that, on average, the farther away a galaxy is, the faster it's going away.

The implication of this is that everything on a very large scale is moving away from everything else, that is, the universe is expanding.

If the universe is expanding, then it follows that looking back in time we would see a smaller and smaller universe, until a point in time when the universe was a very small volume indeed.

This theory is independently confirmed by the cosmic microwave background radiation measurements.

If we want to include God as part of a physical theory, then we would have to be able to say some definite physical things about God. As far as I know, this isn't something that is normally found within the realm of theology.

For an idea to be part of a physical theory, it must have definite consequences, it must lead to facts that can be verified. Otherwise it doesn't have anything to say.

For instance, you might want to say that God causes gravity. It would be very difficult, I think, to go from that sort of idea to a physical theory that would describe the orbits of the planets.

If inclusion of a God idea in the origin of the universe would give us, say, a basis for calculating the total energy in the universe, or the total matter or the relationships between various physical constants, I would say "great, show me how it works". But it is very hard for me to imagine the addition of the idea of God creating the universe being particularly useful in expanding our knowledge of the universe.

2007-05-09 12:45:49 · answer #3 · answered by 2 meter man 3 · 0 0

The Big Band Theory states that the Universe was created by Count Basie.

2007-05-09 12:33:35 · answer #4 · answered by JJ 4 · 3 1

hiya KP. this would nicely be an incredible question, and that i'm now very curious myself. I do think of a lot of it relies upon on what good definition of "steel" we are working from, aka no rely if bands like AC/DC (as somebody pronounced), Aerosmith, Led Zeppelin are admissible. besides the undeniable fact that, employing the "down the Black Sabbath genealogy" definition that maximum human beings extreme steel followers adhere to, i'm completely with you on those options. the only "4th band" i ought to even think of to those 3 is Judas Priest, yet i don't think of even they are extremely the sell that those giants are. My instinct says that Sabbath has the excellent shot at accepted album revenues, Metallica has the excellent shot at cost ticket revenues, in view that they are traveling extra many times than any band this area of the Ramones, and Maiden extremely has the international attractiveness locked down. yet i don't know for specific. enable me go look and notice what I see. BA: Sabbath - Megalomania Maiden - Phantom of the Opera Metallica - No experience sorry approximately

2016-10-15 05:46:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Time began at the instant of the big bang so what caused it or came before it is a question of no real value.

2007-05-13 10:30:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The accepted theory is that two membranes which incorporated a non zero field collided and released the energy

2007-05-09 12:33:10 · answer #7 · answered by Gene 7 · 1 0

☼ the official science is not able to explain it and does not recognize God;
conclusion: there was someone who involuntarily emitted a terrific sneeze or cough;

2007-05-09 13:21:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I agree with JJ

2007-05-09 12:43:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers