Should a thirteen 13 yo be allowed to seek and obtain medical treatment without her parent's knowledge?

Question

If Yes please state why, and the other way aorund.

Thank you.

Answer 1

No, A 13 year old is still a minor. A parent should be involved in all medical treatment.

Answer 2

Well, your question is very clever....you are speaking about abortion without actually using the word.

If a female becomes pregnant, it is HER decision and only hers to make. A pregnant thirteen year old should not be forced by her parents to give birth if she doesn't want to.

If she wants an abortion, she should be able to go to a clinic, medical center, planned parenthood facility or anywhere she wants to go to gather information that will help her do what ever she decides to do.

Too many time in the past, the parents have interferred and forced the girl to have the baby by imposing THEIR feelings and beliefs upon her.

It is unfortunate that a 13 year old would be sexually active - the parents are to blame for that by letting this child run without supervision....However, that doesn't mean the parents have the right to make the decision for her.

Answer 3

Of course, not. A 13 year old is a minor and should be accompanied by her parents when seeking medical treatment. Why would a 13 year old seek medical treatment without her parents? If he or she has STD then he or she might try to conceal it so he/she will seek medical help alone.

Answer 4

No. We're talking about someone who isn't old enough to get even a learner's permit, let alone a driver's license. Being that age the child (yes, still a child) may not know what else is available. Children that age also don't have a great concept of consequences to begin with let alone after something like an abortion. Anyone over the age of 20 thinking of this...think of the choices you made when you were 13, they aren't exactly what you would do now, knowing what you know now (I hope). I rest my case.

Answer 5

Absolutely not! A teen has just maybe reached puberty. it's very important for parents to know what is going on physically with their child (teen). Now if a 13 yo is wanting to go to the Dr. without parental consent what is that child trying to hide from their parents? The parent does not have to be in the exam room, but they should accompany the child (teen).

Answer 6

Yes, I would want my daughter seeking medical knowledge from a doctor rather than some 13 year old on the playground. Optimally, I would hope she would feel comfortable enough to coome see me or her mother. But if not, my 2nd choice would be our doctor.

Answer 7

you know, there became right into a regulation & Order episode that dealt with this subject rely - i think of that's an older one - Chris Noth and Jerry Orbach have been the detectives i think of. good episode. i think of the state would desire to be waiting to stress scientific therapy - extremely no rely if that's a minor. i don't think of it falls under the separation of church and state in any respect. To me, mom and dad that deny their babies suitable scientific therapy are being irresponsible. Now, not taking discomfort drugs is one element - in the event that they don't want to take ibuprofen in the event that they have a headache, that's one element. yet diabetes is a thoroughly diverse difficulty. you're actually not endangering your existence in case you do not take ibuprofen for a headache (in spite of the very incontrovertible fact which you quite would be in some discomfort). Untreated diabetes can extremely be existence threatening as this project shows. If the guy is a minor, i think of the state could stress scientific therapy. If the guy isn't a minor, and refuses therapy on their very own behalf, then the state shouldn't intervene. yet an 11 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous lady is a minor, and he or she isn't allowed to make judgements for herself under the regulation, and if her mom and dad are being irresponsible, the state could step in, religious ideals or not. i might additionally think of that the mummy and dad ought to certainly be held criminally responsible - they'd be charged with criminally negligent homicide. in my opinion, i might fee them with that. i'm specific some will disagree with me, yet i'm of the perception that the coolest Lord did not provide human beings the brains to come again up with remedies for ailments like diabetes and then anticipate us to not use them. the girl's death is tragic, and much extra so via fact it could have actual been prevented. would God save her in His loving hands. Peace!

Answer 8

sure, if you get out on your own and pay all your medical bills, rent, lights, insurance. and if a 13 yo does something wrong, say break a window on a business, who is the one footing the bill. mom and dad. kids are not able to think for themselves, in the big picture. they worry more about tommy telling his friends. just don't screw around and you won't need that type of medical treatment.

Answer 9

depends on the state concerning different "medical" procedures (ie in the case of abortion, some states will allow minors to make their own decision without parental consent; even as young as 12).

so, my answer; yes and no, depending on what kind of medical procedure needed to be done.

Answer 10

No, a thirteen year old is not mature enough to make those type of decisions. That's the parent's job.