2007-05-09 09:29:05 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
True friendship - It's the one least likely to depend on "outside" circumstances.
True faith (support without facts) will diminish and be gradually replaced by either knowledge or disbelief as facts are learned.
True Love is involuntary, as is the potential for losing that love. As such, it's durability is the quickest of the three to fail (and hence most prized!).
Only true friendship is made under the condition that faults are known to exist (and are forgiven), and by choice. It's not infallible, but it's the most durable of the three.
2007-05-09 09:55:11 · answer #1 · answered by freebird 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The fact that you have separated these three objects is a sign to me that you may have never experienced any of these. Now given this is my personal opinion you can take it or leave it but my honest answer is that these are all relative things. With friendship you must have true faith, and in order to have true love you must have a true UNCONDITIONAL friendship. It is a given that we all have personal boundaries, but if you want anything to last it is important that you allow the people that you love, room for growth an human error.
2007-05-09 09:46:33 · answer #2 · answered by bugzmeow 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It all depends on the circumstances. The source that projects these feelings - meaning the partners implied in friendships, relationships or interactions with faith - can have the potential to make it last. But the circumstances can change the direction/trajectory of the feelings. I would say true faith has the potential to fluctuate the most and waver sooner while true friendship has the potential of a long duration if it is settled on a strong base. The actual relationship can be shattered by circumstances that are out of your area of control - like loss through death, but the feelings of love that accompanied the relationship can still remain.
2016-05-19 01:36:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The word "TRUE" implies an absolute fact. Therefore all three are equally infinite. If at any time a love, friendship or faith fails, it was never true. This begs the questions, can man ever really have true love, friendship or faith... or are we cursed to be forever flawed?
2007-05-09 09:39:52 · answer #4 · answered by stn1225 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
True sounds like blue sounds like you need help finding what was never lost. True faith is stupidity, true friendship is a hassle, and true love is selfish.
2007-05-09 10:08:49 · answer #5 · answered by grey_worms 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
~~~ I think all three of your choices are connected together when you're talking about your soulmate. In my opinion though, I believe that true love lasts longer,and maybe even forever. In my case my husband was my only true friend whom I loved with all my heart, and I had total faith in him. I thought we'd be together forever. Then he died. I lost my best friend and now I'm afraid of faith. But I still love my husband with all my heart.~~~
2007-05-09 09:54:50 · answer #6 · answered by donelle g. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If materialism is correct, none of these endures, but passes into oblivion with our death. However, if there is a God who is benevolent and true, and good-- then we can hope that love and friendship will endure, but faith would pass away, as it would not be necessary once one meets God face to face.
2007-05-09 09:42:11 · answer #7 · answered by Timaeus 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
true faith, it will provide the foundations for the other two throughout the trials of life.
2007-05-09 09:36:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
they all three are connected in ways so they last the same
2007-05-09 09:37:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋