Which would you rather be?

Question

1. At war with terror?
2. A victim of terror?

It's either one or the other girls and boys. There is no in between.

I just love how the libs avoid the question altogether. LOL

Answer 1

youve got that right you cant be luke warm on this issue you either are for us or the enemy! I think we need to step it up and drop some well placed tactical nukes on their terroristic selves

Answer 2

1

Answer 3

1

Answer 4

1

Answer 5

This is about the Stupidest question I've come across on
YA for quite a while.
One Or The Other ??????!!!!!!!!.
You must be a very shallow, self centered person.
When the Planes flew into the WTC, everybody became a victim of terror ( Your pretty little hide was just saved because
you weren't there, but anybody could have been including you ).
So the whole of civilisation is automatically at war, with whoever committed these atrocious crimes. RIGHT!!!.
So it is automattically One AND the Other !!.
But if you want to go whingeing and whimpering like a pathetic little girl because people do not agree with the way
you'd LIKE things to be handled, TOUGH !!!.
But maybe you were correct to adress your question to little
'girls and boys' because it does not deserve a considered,
balanced and honest answer.

Answer 6

At war of course.
As for those who said "a true patriot would be in Iraq", thats about as stupid as those who said "there were no terrorist in Iraq before the US".
As for a "true Patriot": what about those in Afghanistan or any other location around the world? What about those soldiers who just didn't get sent, some need to stay here don't they? What about the families that stay behind while their husbands, sons, wifes, daughters, mothers, fathers fight in Iraq?, What about those who can't be in the Military?
My husband is military, 17yrs, 3 of which in Iraq. I can't be military because of surgical issues I am unable to enlist. We have 3 children, are they less of a patriot, because they are too young to enlist? Machine guns are bigger than a 3yr old, maybe thats my daughters downfall?
As for Iraq, not having terrorist: Had you not heard of Iraq before the war? Iraq is very well known for terrorism, especially within its own borders. Saddam just kept them in line. Iraq has been the 2nd largest Al Quaida stronghold for years, even before the war started. You may wanna look at a map once in a while, or atleast the history channel.

Answer 7

1. At war with terror

Answer 8

We must remain at war with terror, because we have been the victim of terror (for many, many years).

The only way to end our troubles would be for our country and everyone here to convert to the jihadist version of Islam.

I have no desire to supplant my beliefs.

Answer 9

MOST DEFINATLY AT WAR with Terror!!

I refuse to fall victim to anything! I will not submit to the spinless freaks over in the middle east!

Answer 10

Okay so we will be at war with terror from now til the end of time!! Seeing as if we aren't fighting in the middle east we will be fighting here??? America will go bankrupt. Then how do we defend ourselves here seeing as we won't have anymore money to fight on their soil. Seeing as it's got to be one or the other.
So why don't we just bomb the entire middle east and end it all.

Answer 11

Of course I'd rather be at war with terror. That's why I would like to see us extradite ourselves from this civil war and actually address the war on terror. What a novel idea.