Seeming as judges won't send them to cells (over crowding) why not just remove their john thomas? It would be a very embarassing punishment, and ensures no more funny business... could do the same with peado's, if they're the tip to 'get off' from the pictures.
And while your at it, know any funny names for bollocks? I love "General and two Colonels"!
2007-05-09 05:46:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yep, I think the whole lot should be removed!
Heard a funny name for them the other night but can't remember what it was! I like meat and two veg!
2007-05-09 05:55:03 · answer #1 · answered by jayne1653 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Silly question as you know that they receive a stiff prison sentence if they are guilty. In the event that they are found not guilty but they are guilty, then we have to wait for them to do it again. Such is English law. At the same time, how many innocent people are locked up in prison? I dread to think.
2007-05-09 14:20:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A big NO from me.
Simply because rape has little to do with sex more to do with control and anger. Therefore control and anger would still be there but come out in another way; perhaps in the form of murder.
Castration has the effect of increasing the body muscles vastly leaving you with a BIG angry dude who needs to control, a recipe for disaster.
2007-05-09 13:50:24 · answer #3 · answered by ALLEN B 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why stop at your 'solution'. We could always bring back burning at the stake or why not regular weekend executions? It should lift the UKs status on the world scene!
2007-05-09 14:04:28 · answer #4 · answered by James Mack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any man who commits violent sex crimes should be castrated. Perhaps paedophiles who only look at pictures or videos should be given bromide implants to quash any sexual cravings?
Am I right in thinking that some testosterone is produced in the testicles, therefore removal should reduce any aggressive tendancies a bit? (It wouldn't make them bigger, as someone has suggested).
2007-05-09 14:33:57 · answer #5 · answered by finch 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
This should happen to bill clinton.
Let's elect hillary and let another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.
2007-05-09 12:53:15 · answer #6 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I wonder sometimes why we have animals being tested on in laboroties when we could have monsters like these to test on. Yeah sure remove their bits....only i wouldnt want to be the one who does it....but i would happily replace testing on animals with them
2007-05-09 14:18:53 · answer #7 · answered by stormydays 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How about putting them all in a mental institution, and forgetting they were there for ever and tattooed with "I am a rapist on their forehead, the sick perverts they convince themselves the poor victim wants it, ahhh don't get me going on this one please.
2007-05-09 13:15:38 · answer #8 · answered by ROBERT M 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes they should, i totally agree with you, it makes me sick, my friend went through it, it has wasted her life, if not that they should be lock up for ever, hope that helps, all the best.
2007-05-09 12:51:44 · answer #9 · answered by sarah1962 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
not really penis removal, but I would be in favor of castration
2007-05-11 00:19:59 · answer #10 · answered by tm41170 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋