English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Currently, the President is constitutionally limited to two terms. Neither house of Congress is limited.

Should either be term limited? Should both? Neither?

I was originally going to ask people to choose only limiting both or limiting neither, but that seemed too restrictive a question.

Should federal judges be term-limited too?

Thanks for your thoughts.

2007-05-09 04:51:20 · 5 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

5 answers

Term limits deny the people the right to choose who they want to represent them. They tie their hands. "Stop me before I vote for the same person again!!"

2007-05-09 05:00:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Yes to all - one term and you're out to go back to your constituents (and the real world) before being allowed to come back again for another, non-continguous term after becoming acquainted again with the reality all of us face every day. No one should be allowed to serve more than eight years continuously in any position to which they're elected by the populace.

The judicial system should be completely self-supporting (no taxpayer dollars for buildings, people, jails, etc.) with judgeships being filled on a rotating basis by those with seniority and proving they're not incompetent. Same with professional sports and stadiums/arenas for millionaire athletes. Same with hospitals (non-profit, hah!) and millionaire doctors.

2007-05-09 05:04:39 · answer #2 · answered by Ben 5 · 1 0

. term limits exist already, and you recognize what they're: 2 years for Representatives 6 years for Senators. hence, each and every 2 years, you get to solid a vote FOR the challenger or against the incumbent. comparable for Senators each and every SIX years. term limits of the different sort are anti-democratic: they could get rid of the peoples' precise to decide for. term limits could additionally 'rob' the respective chambers of Congress of the "Institutional information" gained by those some years in provider. you won't like that concept, yet while adequate of your fellow voters shop balloting her or him into place of work repeatedly, then you ought to settle for the will Of the final public. That technique worked to go with Bush two times. yet i could recommend a metamorphosis interior the dimensions of the words: 4 years for Congresspeople, 5 years for President, and nonetheless 6 years for Senator (or TEN years, a myth of mine). Why, you ask? the fee and time spent on campaigns and fundraising is ridiculous, hence my advocation of longer spans of provider; the time beyond regulation additionally provides to a feeling of continuity for the incumbents. .

2016-10-30 22:58:09 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

if we had term limits we would eliminate the professional politicians once and for all.

2007-05-09 05:12:34 · answer #4 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 1 0

No, to all.

In a representative democracy, the voters should be able to vote whomever they like into office, for as long as they like.

2007-05-09 05:01:08 · answer #5 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers