Alfred or Wilson. Or Vincent or David.
2007-05-09 04:39:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Becky 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I actually rather like Roderick. I also have taken a liking to the name Milo.
Clarence is pretty bad. I also don't like the names Clyde, Claude, or Chauncey. Seymour is unbearable. I've never been able to stand guys named Wayne.
2007-05-09 04:58:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by badkitty1969 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Roderick. Clarence isn't too bad. Worse names are Hunter, Connor, Dakota, Lawyer Malloy.
2007-05-09 04:40:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chairman LMAO 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of the two, I would say "Roderick", b/c people are likely call you 'Rod' for short, & then you have a horrible complex AND a lousy name.
'Barclay' is probably the worst name I've ever heard for a guy; my drinkin' buddy gets raked over the coals all the time for THAT one.
Later Daze! =)
2007-05-09 04:52:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Clarence is worse. Roderick can be shortened to Roddie or something, which isn't so bad.
Farquhar is another bad one.
2007-05-09 04:41:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Iron Serpent 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clarence is probably worse as it can't even be shortened to something reasonable.
Though my friend's neighbours have called their child Banjo which is worse as it sounds like a dog's name!
2007-05-09 04:59:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mrs Badcrumble 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sebastian
2007-05-09 04:43:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bonnie B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I kind of like Clarence. Leverne is pretty bad.
2007-05-09 04:39:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tough one. Okay, Clarence.
2007-05-10 03:26:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by John M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Allouyisious
2007-05-09 04:41:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jim M 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hercamer
2007-05-09 04:39:15
·
answer #11
·
answered by mumsy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋