2007-05-09 04:23:15 · 43 answers · asked by Pearl 5 in Beauty & Style ➔ Fashion & Accessories
16 any day of the week. Just remember Marilyn Monroe, the stars still try to emanate her look, but fail miserably cos they get so skinny they have no hips for the clothes to cling to and they have to get boob jobs done so that their dresses have some boobs to cling to. I say enjoy your curves, and your man will too. There is nothing sexier than a 16 in a corset, much more to look at than a 0 in a corset looking like she might snap if someone gets a bit physical. Size 0 is like a little girl or young boy. Give the men something to look at and get hold of.
2007-05-09 05:52:47 · answer #1 · answered by sundaychitchatgirl 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather be a size 16 than a size 0. I've had an eating disorer in the past and thought of being emaciated makes me feel sick. I'm now a size 10-12, but I'd never want to be less than a size 8-10 again.
A UK size 16 really isn't as big as people are making out, I've checked some size charts, it's a 32 inch waist and 42 inch hips...not small by any means, but not exactly huge either. A size 0 is a 23 inch waist and 33 inch hips, that is crazy skinny for a grown woman unless she is naturally very petite in build.
HTH : )
2007-05-09 04:42:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Size 0
2007-05-09 04:27:32 · answer #3 · answered by Sonell 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would rather be a size 16 because being a size 0 isnt healthy. I think being a curvy size 16 is great. The average size of women is a size 14 anyways so I would rather be above average.
2007-05-09 04:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by missashleywatson 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
size 0
2007-05-09 04:29:08 · answer #5 · answered by westbaxter 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
16
2007-05-09 04:28:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Size 16....There seem to be few size 0 women who don't spend a great deal of time worrying about satying a size 0. I personally think "size 0" is ridiculous. I've had the experience of being too thin, thanks to illness, and even then, the smallest I ever wore was a size 8/10. It's stupid-- the average woman is not that small, just in bone structure. Fat isn't healthy, but neither is ridiculously thin.
Besides, speaking from experience...? Women who don't worry about their weight / size all the time have a lot more fun in life. :o)
2007-05-09 04:30:55 · answer #7 · answered by porschefraulein 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Since I get to pick my size, do I get to pick my height?? Either size for me would be unhealthy. But if I get to be taller, I would be a 16. If I got to be shorter I would be a 0.
I think I would go for 16 though. I would rather be curvy than look emaciated or look like a 10 year old boy.
2007-05-09 04:40:27 · answer #8 · answered by Danielle 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
if i really had to choose id say a 0 but thats not in my opinion the perfect size im not grossly unhappy at a size 10 but i would like to slim down to a size 8... neither size 0 or size 16 is very healthy unless your naturally that way
2007-05-09 08:34:16 · answer #9 · answered by francesca s 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd be a size 0 and eat my way to a size 16!!!
2007-05-09 04:28:03 · answer #10 · answered by Katie 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋