Since the "media" with their George Soros mandated agenda only prints anti-U.S. propaganda, media monopolies should be outlawed like monopolies in other industries.
2007-05-09 03:11:37 · 13 answers · asked by Philip H 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Anything that the Bush administration supports has to be evil in the minds of liberals. Nothing like that can be viewed a success because it is part of Bush legacy. It must be viewed as a failure in accordance with their propaganda.
2007-05-09 03:36:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was not the Patriot act that prevented another terrorist attack. it was a Patriot that acted.
As to your question of little press coverage, you are mistaken.
It is on the front page of a majority of newspapers worldwide.
It was the lead story on all major networks all day yesterday.
Except maybe Fox News, they may have decided not to report the story for some biased reason. I would not know since I do not watch Fox.
Except occasionally the Red Eye show, That is some great semi-scripted comedy there.
2007-05-09 03:52:31 · answer #2 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the Patriot Act had NOTHING to do with the discovery and capture of these six morons. By the way - George Soros does not own a single newspaper, radio or television station, while all but a handful of those are owned by Repugicans! "Liberal press" my hairy behind!
2007-05-09 03:34:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Patriot Act my @ss. A working stiff at a store.
The unidentified clerk is being credited with tipping off authorities in January 2006 after one of the suspects asked him to transfer a video to DVD that showed 10 men shooting weapons at a firing range and calling for jihad, prosecutors said.
"If we didn't get that tip," said U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie, "I couldn't be sure what would happen." FBI agent J.P. Weis called the clerk the "unsung hero" of the case.
Even the FBI admits they may not have caught them if the store clerk had not notified the authorities.
Why did it take the Patriot Act from Jan 2006 until May of 2007, 1 year and 4 months to get around to arresting the terrorists. Patriot Act dictates that they could have been picked up immediately, an held indefinitely without being charged.
2007-05-09 03:23:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You don't hear about the many success stories in the War on Terror from the "mainstream media" because of the influence of billionaire George Soros and his anti-America, ultra-liberal agenda!
2007-05-09 03:22:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you are referring to the NJ gang, it was reported on the front page of the New York Times with extensive coverage.
2007-05-09 03:18:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
So, let me get this straight, that store clerk alerting the FBI is part of the Patriot Act? Where was the FBI all along? Those people had been in the US for several years. Wasn't the FBI aware of them and what they were doing or did they only start their surveillance AFTER the store clerk reported the video?
2007-05-09 03:18:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
The coverage was on all of the news media,
including Germany and BBC!!!
2007-05-09 03:28:09 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I saw coverage of the terrorist attack on every network last night....Nice try though....how is the media a monopoly when you have Fox news?
2007-05-09 03:17:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
The patriot act didn't stop those men, an intelligent concerned citizen and swift action by the security agencies we already have did.
Nice try though.
2007-05-09 03:19:42 · answer #10 · answered by truthspeaker10 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋