English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

yes i find it absoloutely appalling. i am incensed by the number of syllables in this word, it disgusts me, i mean surely there are other words were them syllables are needed?!

lol.

2007-05-09 02:14:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nice and yes, totally! Just like Demonstrative! Ouch!

2007-05-09 03:19:19 · answer #2 · answered by Jeeves 3 · 0 0

totally unacceptable.for a word that means one syllable to contain FIVE, its outrageous

2007-05-09 07:24:22 · answer #3 · answered by tennantsbiatchsokeepurmittsoff! 4 · 0 0

Not necessarily inappropriate, but oddly surprising.

I consulted the syllabus, and it hovers being monophobic.

2007-05-09 02:24:04 · answer #4 · answered by rockman 7 · 0 0

No, not inappropriate. Gets the meaning across doesn't it?

2007-05-09 02:20:27 · answer #5 · answered by Mrs. Miller 3 · 0 0

I think the same about "monosyllabic" as I do "abbreviation"!!!

2007-05-09 02:15:52 · answer #6 · answered by abcd 5 · 2 0

It's a good point.

And why is there only one Monopolies Commission, that's what I want to know.

2007-05-09 02:33:14 · answer #7 · answered by Daniel R 6 · 0 0

And while we're on the subject, why is Dyslexic so difficult to spell?

2007-05-09 02:53:39 · answer #8 · answered by The Bankman. 4 · 0 0

No more so than driving on a parkway or parking on a driveway!

2007-05-09 02:22:04 · answer #9 · answered by rcm351 2 · 0 0

lol, yes very good. I'd like to know what sort of sick b**tard decided to call a speach impedement a lisp or "lithp".

2007-05-09 02:20:28 · answer #10 · answered by Quizard 7 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers