yes i find it absoloutely appalling. i am incensed by the number of syllables in this word, it disgusts me, i mean surely there are other words were them syllables are needed?!
lol.
2007-05-09 02:14:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nice and yes, totally! Just like Demonstrative! Ouch!
2007-05-09 03:19:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jeeves 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
totally unacceptable.for a word that means one syllable to contain FIVE, its outrageous
2007-05-09 07:24:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by tennantsbiatchsokeepurmittsoff! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not necessarily inappropriate, but oddly surprising.
I consulted the syllabus, and it hovers being monophobic.
2007-05-09 02:24:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by rockman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not inappropriate. Gets the meaning across doesn't it?
2007-05-09 02:20:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mrs. Miller 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the same about "monosyllabic" as I do "abbreviation"!!!
2007-05-09 02:15:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by abcd 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's a good point.
And why is there only one Monopolies Commission, that's what I want to know.
2007-05-09 02:33:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Daniel R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
And while we're on the subject, why is Dyslexic so difficult to spell?
2007-05-09 02:53:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Bankman. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No more so than driving on a parkway or parking on a driveway!
2007-05-09 02:22:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by rcm351 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol, yes very good. I'd like to know what sort of sick b**tard decided to call a speach impedement a lisp or "lithp".
2007-05-09 02:20:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Quizard 7
·
4⤊
0⤋