Hillary’s activist work at Yale with the Black Panthers, won her a summer internship at the Berkeley office of attorney Robert Treuhaft in 1972. A hardline Stalinist, Treuhaft had quit the Communist Party in 1958 only because it was losing members and no longer provided a good platform for his activism.
"Treuhaft is a man who dedicated his entire legal career to advancing the agenda of the Soviet Communist Party and the KGB," notes historian Stephen Schwartz
2007-05-08 21:20:41 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There you go again, trying to put two and two together and coming up with four again.
First of all, just because Hillary did activist work with a racial supremacist group doesn't mean she believes what they do.
Secondly, just because she was awarded and accepted an internship with someone who was a hardcore Communist (and later married a man who spent time in the Soviet Union while on a Rhodes Scholarship to Oxford) doesn't make her a Communist or Socialist.
Have we learned nothing from American Taliban John Walker? Of course he wasn't a terrorist. He just went to one of their training camps and fought along side them. That doesn't make him one of them.....does it?
2007-05-09 01:14:43 · answer #1 · answered by Mitch 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
This is not being discussed in the media because it is a false rumor. Your Republican masters have told you to put it here because such misinformation can only be disseminated as internet gossip, no reputable publication would print it.
Further, this is not a genuine question; it's just another assertion masquerading as a question. What you mean to do is spread disinformation. Snopes debunks Hillary's supposed work with the Black Panthers. Yale, which was also President Bush's alma mater, had a volunteer lawyer project for criminal defense, and Hillary worked briefly on this. If Hillary had any communist connections, Republicans would have something better than this or the fact that she worked 35 years ago as summer intern in the law office of someone who had allegedly once been a communist.
2007-05-09 04:45:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋
In my own words I think the media and Hillary are all in the same boat together and all come from the same mold.
They are carbon copies of one another whose ways of thinking are identical and agendas are the same.
The media loves Hillary because they love themselves and would never turn on one of their own.
Why ole Hill is just like a little sister to them.
They simply adore her.
All of them are like an empty can that rattles the most.
Just making alot of noise without any sense.
2007-05-09 05:19:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because Hillary has a specific list of things she will discuss and issues that are OFF LIMITS. No one dare question the Queen on issues of any importance or bring up some not so nice truths about her past............(Whitewater, Filegate, Travelgate etc). But it's fine for her to smear Obama et al with half truths and innuendo.
2007-05-09 09:26:16 · answer #4 · answered by Cherie 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I didn't realize that the Girl Scouts was a communist organization. I never knew that Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater was a communist. Why didn't someone tell me that the College Republicans was a communist organization. Wow and Yale University is a communist school, gee I never knew that. And the weird vibe I got in Arkansas...well I'll be the entire state of Arkansas is nothing but commies...that explains it...
Oh and the Rose Law Firm...
Arkansas Children's Hospital
TCBY Yogurt
Wal - Mart
And the voters of the entire state of New York...wow all communists...Oh and supporting military action in Afghanistan a communist plot!
Investigating the hidden sex scenes in Grand Theft Auto...
Gee I never knew that was a communist plot too...
Oh and merciful heavens why didn't someone warn us that the radical idea the blacks are people too was just a commie plot...
Oh I am so thankful that you are here to protect us from those awful reds....
2007-05-09 04:55:06 · answer #5 · answered by Cacaoatl 3 · 1⤊ 5⤋
You need to watch Chaplin's The Great Dictator.
2007-05-09 04:25:17 · answer #6 · answered by Superdog 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I suppose it is being hidden along with Bush's hippy, peacenick past (after all he took drugs and refused to go to war).
Grow up - who she worked with 35 years ago is hardly a fair basis to judge her now.
Debate what she is advocating now - it is out there - why are you so desperate to avoid it with red herrings like this?
2007-05-09 04:56:52 · answer #7 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary Clinton has no "communist background." And you really should try another tack. You've only managed to show you don't even know the difination of the word, much less anything else..
And as for jokes like Schwartz-I am a historian, and I can tell you from here that bozo couldn't pass a REAL course in history if his sorry life depended on it. Jerks like that are laughinstocks.
2007-05-09 04:33:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 7⤋
Heh Heh I quite enjoy your questions =D, Really it's that the liberals are trying to hide it just like they did with Bill clinton they are trying to divert attention away from the facts and back to the media *Which is liberal controlled* and as you probably know is full of liberal nut cases..
2007-05-09 04:25:53 · answer #9 · answered by Hawtman1092 3 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Shouldn't the backround of all politicians be brought to light?
2007-05-09 05:15:24 · answer #10 · answered by ? ? ? ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋