English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please answer specifically these questions:
What was the US's attitude towards the Holocaust?
What did the US do in response to the genocide?
What could the US have done?

2007-05-08 20:01:41 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

3 answers

There has been an article in History Today magazine in the last year on the attitude of Hollywood companies to Nazism in the 1930s- some opposed it when Jewish staff members were oppressed, most went along with it, as is typical- companies always just try to get along and make a return for the shareholders. GM, IBM and Coca-Cola were among the well-known US companies that operated alongside the Nazis.

The extent of the genocide was little known in the West- it was mostly rumour. The more overt acts were carried out in the East- in Poland and Russia- where information was unreliable. Most of the mass killing didn't occur until the war was well under way.

The western countries had plenty to occupy them in terms of pure survival without worrying about getting to the bottom of rumours about what was happening to the Jews. Churchill and Roosevelt spent every day thinking about battles, war production, military appointments, labour shortages and a thousand other things without spending time trying to further prove that the Nazis really were nasty people. In any case, the Japanese were getting on with a very vicious campaign in China involving systematic murder, torture and rape of hundreds of thousands of people, Stalin had just finished murdering half his army and starving millions of Ukrainians... genocide was a common currency and you could ask why we do nothing about the horrors in the world today when we are in a far better position to know about and deal with them.

Finally, very little could have been done anyway, aside from what they did do- get on with winning the war. The Allies suffered massive losses in trying to bomb Berlin from Britain- most death camps were further east. You couldn't get your bomber crews killed to take the pressure off the Jews- they had joined and were risking their lives for their own loved ones- to beat Germany and save their own countries.

2007-05-08 21:01:24 · answer #1 · answered by llordlloyd 6 · 0 0

First of all why do not you perform a little study. I'll support you alongside. Genocide is: the planned and systematic extermination of a country wide, racial, political, or cultural organization. Now with the holocaust, this went a couple of approaches. HItler was once making an attempt exterminate all people who did not believe him and who did not have compatibility into his superb little rectangular. So he simply obtained country wide, racial, political, and cultural organizations. A fetus does not have political affairs, tradition, or any of that. Most females who decide on to get an abortion don't seem to be doing it when you consider that of the race of the little one both. They're doing it when you consider that oftentimes there's plenty extra to recollect in bringing a youngster into this international than without difficulty that a fetus has a beating middle. For illustration, how she will feed it, how she'll uncover the money and time to maintain it, and of direction the harm bodily, emotionally and mentally that it could do to her. Not to say what issues the youngster can have. The handiest means abortion will also be genocide is that if it is being pressured upon females. Such on the subject of an invading military. Second, abortion is not homicide. It's authorized, and legally the fetus is not human. So it is no distinctive than hitting a squirrel with the intention to paintings. I'll go away it as much as you to determine why many men and women might recollect seeking to say abortion is just like the Holocaust as utterly offensive in a lot the identical means as while Peta attempted to mention that the way in which we kill chickens is just like the Holocaust.

2016-09-05 12:53:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The U-S's attitude toward the holocaust was shock and anger, when it became known, late in World War II. Most people simply didn't know about it, and I don't know if it was even reported by any of the intelligence services prior to the invasion of Europe in 1944.

The U-S response to the genocide was partly to educate German people, many of whom didn't know about the holocaust either, by making them go to the camps and help in burying the dead. The Nuremburg trials were also a response to the genocide as well as to the prosecution of the war in general.

There really wasn't much we could have done had we known earlier. We had to invade Europe, and that took a buildup that took most of three years.

2007-05-08 20:13:40 · answer #3 · answered by Warren D 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers