Does anyone else agree that Paris Hilton should be in JAIL more than 45 days?

Question

Our legal system is too passive. I say if someone drinks and drives, especially being a public figure, and then disregards their probation, they need to be locked up for much more than 45 days. It's no wonder there are so many twisted minded fools in our country. We get away with too many privileges, which I'm happy for, but dude if you break the law you must face the consequences. She should be locked up for like a year. Anyone else agree?

Answer 1

Does anybody remember when Paris attacked a guy that was selling her sex tape, and went on to destroy that tape?Under CA law, this is a "strong-arm" robbery (Penal Code Section 211(b)); punishable by a term of 2, 3, or 5 years in prison. Pursuant to CA's "Three Strikes Law" this would constitute a "first strike". That is what Paris really should have received- a conviction for a violent felony, 2 years minimum prison term, and a strike. She is highly fortunate to have received so many chances and only end up with 45 days.

Answer 2

Let's just have her serve her time without all this stuff about asking the Governor for a pardon.

You can be sure that this is not the last time she will be in trouble with the law. The amount of jail time increases with each violation. I PREDICT THAT SHE WILL HAVE ADDITIONAL ARRESTS IN THE FUTURE AFTER SHE GETS OUT OF JAIL.

Answer 3

I think she should have been in jail already. It was evidently her PR agent's job to keep her out of jail, because she fired him. Seems to me the lawyer would be the more likely candidate for that job.

But yes, she should be in jail longer than 45 days.

Answer 4

45 days works for me to start with - probation after wards.
One more slip, she should don her orange jumpsuit for at least a year. She is a spoiled & selfish little girl

Answer 5

Yes I do agree. They are Passive ONLY with stupid celebrities its so sickening...She should at least get 6-9 months at the LEAST.