2007-05-08 17:29:38 · 7 answers · asked by d2 7 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
What search is good without a discovery.
2007-05-08 17:31:48 · answer #1 · answered by SaChiE 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Search, though it's nice to be proved right once in a while. I recently heard an interview with one of the scientists working on the Stardust mission (the one that collected material from a comet). It turns out that there are some serious gaps in our understanding of how comets formed, and the interviewer said something like "Doesn't this mean you'll have to rethink a lot of your theories?". The reply was "Yes, isn't it great!!"
2007-05-09 04:24:25 · answer #2 · answered by Iridflare 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Search."
"Discovery" has a sort-of finallity to it, like there isn't anything past that point. To search, though... many new discoveries can be made while searching.
2007-05-09 00:44:24 · answer #3 · answered by BotanyDave 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
search,discovery would be one of the results of the action
of search
2007-05-09 03:27:36 · answer #4 · answered by kokopelli 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer discovery. More exciting finding out something new.
2007-05-09 00:36:34 · answer #5 · answered by Spilamilah 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Search, do find the answers to my questions.
2007-05-09 00:37:01 · answer #6 · answered by Aadi C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both!
2007-05-09 00:51:39 · answer #7 · answered by Golden Shine 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋