what is the similarity between Renaissance and Cubism artists? ARTISTS?

Question

BETWWN ARTISTS .

10 POINT!

OR their owne INFLUENCE

Answer 1

they are actually VERY different.

renaissance art was much more realistic, while cubism art was much more abstract. for example, renaissance artists came up with perspective, making their paintings more realistic, while cubism artists completely manipulated perspective, giving their art MULTIPLE perspectives.

oh but now i see you're saying between the ARTISTS, not the art. well, i'd say that the artists were both revolutionary in the way that they used perspective. for the renaissance artists, coming up with perspective was revolutionary. for the cubist artists, breaking down perspective was revolutionary.

Answer 2

They are as different as night and day. I dont know - perhaps composition? Or perhaps that most of the Cubists - like the artists of the Renaiassance were also great sketch artists? Picasso was a great sketcher. Four years of art history and that one is puzzling. Or maybe you could say that the still lifes of the Renaissance influenced the still lifes of the Cubists?Pax - C

Answer 3

It may have to do with the question of representation: they were trying, in their own way, and with their own methods, to represent what they saw as "reality". For the Cubists, it meant trying to capture all the facets of their subject, while in the Renaissance, the development of the perspective allowed artists to represent aspects of reality thad had been neglected before.

Answer 4

~None whatsoever. The cubists liked squares and rigid angles. Have you ever seen a Renaissance nude? Not the same at all. Round, flabby, wrinkled, not a decent line on them. The cubists resented that perversity of the flesh and painted accordingly.