Could a Liberal tell me what Hillary's stance is on Iraq?

Question

First, she was for the Iraq war and voted for it,then she was against the war, then it was Bush's fault and she was neutral, and then she was for cut and run. 2 days ago her stance was, assuming she hasn't changed her mind since then, is she is for funding the troops but if anything goes wrong, Bush will be held accountable. Could someone tell me where she stands because the rocket scientists at NASA still can't figure it out?

boogity - Which time?

Well, you guys are 0 for 2 so far. I knew this wasn't going to be an easy one to answer.

lltrix - Is that page up to the second because she changes her mind minute to minute? Thanks.

lltrix - I asked you a simple question. Is her site up to date? Thanks.

Answer 1

Please explain to me when it became a bad thing to change one's mind when evidence contrary to one's position is presented. I consider someone willing to admit they were wrong and change their mind much more intelligent than someone who refuses, even in the case of (occasionally) overwhelming evidence against them to budge on an issue. Which is not to imply that I agree with miss Hillary's exact position on the war necessarily, but the fact remains.

Answer 2

I actual do no longer understand if i visit vote for Obama, if Senator Clinton would not win the primaries. i does no longer via fact I even have great reservations approximately Senator Obama. As witnessed interior the distinctive debates this first season, he's excellent w/ scripted speeches, whether he somewhat lacks adventure, is vulnerable in unprepared responses to proposed coverage and there's a good purchase that we don't comprehend approximately him. additionally, his distant places coverage stance jogs my memory very lots of Jimmy Carter, who - nonetheless - an extremely large guy - grew to become into yet another merchandising/cultish created president....very vulnerable interior the top. i think that he's actual plenty extra liberal than Clinton. His heart isn't solidly w/ the middle classification, as Clinton is, and that i think that he could enhance taxes for extra classes helping the decrease instructions. under Obama, the middle classification concerns related to well being care, practise (the two greater practise AND the pledge to do away w/ "No toddler Left at the back of" failed coverage) and small corporation marketers, could stay swept under the rug. Economically issues could be out of kilter - interior the different course from the previous 8/years. i like Clinton via fact she is the stability between the two. whether, i does no longer for a 2d ignore that John McCain will recommend 4/extra years of the comparable financial policies, distant places coverage and the addition of his awful concepts approximately unlawful immigration. So....i'm nonetheless on the fence & basically hoping that Senator Clinton wins.

Answer 3

Actually, she did not speak out against the war, until a lot of Republicans did. She did support the presidents policy, even though she criticized it.

A word of note: If she can pull off rescinding the Iraq war resolution, she will become the next President.

Answer 4

I'm not a liberal (sorry I don't meet the criteria), but here's her stance. She supported the war initially because it was popular in the polls. Then she decided she was against it, when the leftist decided it was unpopular to support it. Now she will rail against it, and President Bush, because most of the far left financial supporters are going elsewhere, and she needs them back for the campaign. From here, its hard to say, wherever she thinks the support is. Also if she is speaking in the south, whatever her position is, she'll say it with a drawl.

Answer 5

Ask that on Wednesday,Friday and Sunday and take an average. Factor in what Nancy Pulloutsi has to say, what John Kerry thinks,
and what group she's addressing.
Ad a few sprinkles of self righteousness an a drop or tow of "Bush screwed up" blend, and there's your answer.

Answer 6

What part of the following don't you understand. Bush, wrongly, determined that Iraq was a national security threat to the U.S. Bush then decided to use force, rather than trying to get the inspectors back in by threatening to use force(obviously the inspectors would've determined what we already know, that there were no WMD's). So why is Hillary to blame for Bush's bungling and spectacular incompetence?

Bush is the one who decided that the use of force was "necessary and appropriate" obviously. Congress simply gave him the use of force as an option in order that he could effectively negotiate with Saddam. Instead, he bungled the negotiations and went to war on the basis of a finding that was incorrect.

Sorry to confuse you with the facts. Bush was "the decider" in this case.

"SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) AUTHORIZATION. The president is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as HE DETERMINES to be NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE in order to

(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and

(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq.

Answer 7

She's been foursquare for the war from the start. She STILL hasn't called for a pullout.

Why is your question addressed to liberals? You think there's a memo or something? Only the conservatives get memos (Heritage Foundation is one source).

Also, why do you and other conservatives capitalize "liberal"? That's just weird.

Answer 8

Well now the Loon from NY is authoring a bill that would
de-authorize the authorization to go in to war.

Some how, I think that Bush will VETO that one

Hillary's Menopause must be working overtime

Answer 9

What makes you think all liberals are voting for Hillary?
But it's obvious that you have not yet learned how to Google. So I did it for you.
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/iraq/

Are you really that lazy to find out for yourself. Or, are you hanging out in front of the t.v waiting for Fox to tell you what to think again?

So is Bush still deluded into thinking he's going to win this 'war' conducting it the same losing way from the same losing policies he has from the start?

Answer 10

shes against the war now .... only because no one is going to vote for her if she's pro Iraq