They would leave them to slaughter by pulling U.S. troops out.
2007-05-08 15:29:51 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
latest: so your solution is to allow more innocents to be killed?
2007-05-08 15:42:21 · update #1
Bush led them to slaughter by invading and creating the power vacuum there that exists today.
2007-05-08 15:40:38 · answer #1 · answered by latest_greatest 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Whatever possessed you to draw that conclusion?
Could it be the immediate withdrawal proposal from Sen. Carl Levin, Sen. Joe Biden and Senate leader Harry Reed? Or possibly the withdrawal deadline attached to the troop funding bill? Or the non-binding, total waste of time, surrender bill proposed by the liberals earlier?
The liberals have thrown in the towel and embraced defeat and to hell with the people who have supported us in Iraq - and, simply put, they don't understand the term, "commitment" - sad, isn't it?
2007-05-08 22:53:23 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Liberals who don't care about the Iraqi people are cowards who do not care about America either. Their own leaders were for this war when it began, and like their leaders they deny any responsibility now.
2007-05-08 22:57:15 · answer #3 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If Iraq was a major dope supplier theyd be crying out about it, libs care only for themselves
2007-05-09 06:27:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Politicians say, and do, whatever they can to win an election.
Both sides do the same stuff.
2007-05-09 15:19:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
darker skin people (sudan) are more important, except if they live in Rwanda.
because bush bashing and appeasing the $moveon.org$ crowd is more important than defeating al qeada
2007-05-09 01:11:10 · answer #6 · answered by joe b 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There Liberal...
Geraldo.
2007-05-08 22:48:00 · answer #7 · answered by katolitoli 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋