What is the difference between Cheney, Bush , Karl Rove and the 3 STOOGES?

Question

Not a lot except...the 3 STOOGES are at least funny and far less evil and dangerous.

Can you imagine George W Bush in a chess game with Osama Bin Laden? He is and he was checkmated the day he invaded IRAQ

Answer 1

The three stooges weren't psychopathic, lying, mass murderers hell bent on destroying the US Constitution, fighting a perpetual war against a shadowy, faceless, ever-changing enemy and trying to create a North American Union. But hey, it's for our good, really. Just trust em.

Answer 2

The 3 stooges behaved in a well-coordinated manner.

People can look back on the 3 stooges work long after the fact and appreciate.

Answer 3

Ah, our newest edition to the seditious.
The difference is this, despite your obvious need to answer your own questions: These are our elected representatives, regardless of party affilliation. They may have their goals and policies disagreed with, dissented with, or even protested (usually by people unwilling to actually start a petition by reason of being politically challenged, but sometimes AFTER such methods fail, protest is necessary).

However, when people act seditiously, call them names, spread unfounded rumors, side with our enemies, treat our leaders as "guilty until proven innocent" (a more unpatriotic attitude does not exist), then they have chosen sides, and are the enemy of all people who support their country, regardless of the rightness of their other claims.

There are many people who patriotically disagree with President Bush, and oppose many of his goals.

Your actions, however, are worthy of nothing but contempt.

Oh, I'm a democrat. Some of us are U.S. citizens, first, democrats, second.

Answer 4

The 3 Stooges brought in a profit.

And to the Great American: [quote] Ignorance is bliss [/quote]

Answer 5

The Three stooges are smarter

Answer 6

There were actually 6 stooges, just not all at the same time

Answer 7

Why are Democrats always depressed?
Some 45% of all Republicans report being very happy, compared with just 30% of Democrats and 29% of independents. This finding has also been around a long time; Republicans have been happier than Democrats every year since the General Social Survey began taking its measurements in 1972. Pew surveys since 1991 also show a partisan gap on happiness; the current 16 percentage point gap is among the largest in Pew surveys, rivaled only by a 17 point gap in February 2003.
Could it be that Republicans are so much happier now because their party controls all the levers of federal power? Not likely. Since 1972, the GOP happiness edge over Democrats has ebbed and flowed in a pattern that appears unrelated to which party is in political power.
For example, Republicans had up to a 10 and 11 percentage point happiness edge over Democrats in various years of both the Carter and Clinton presidencies, and as small as a three and five percentage point edge in various years of the Reagan and first Bush presidencies. Also, we should explain here a bit about how our survey questionnaire was constructed. The question about happiness was posed at the very beginning of the interview, while the question about political affiliation was posed at the back end, along with questions about demographic traits. So respondents were not cued to consider their happiness through the frame of partisan politics. This question is about happiness; it is not a question about happiness with partisan outcomes.
Of course, there's a more obvious explanation for the Republicans' happiness edge. Republicans tend to have more money than Democrats, and -- as we've already discovered -- people who have more money tend to be happier.
But even this explanation only goes so far. If one controls for household income, Republicans still hold a significant edge: that is, poor Republicans are happier than poor Democrats; middle-income Republicans are happier than middle-income Democrats, and rich Republicans are happier than rich Democrats.
Might ideology be the key? It's true that conservatives, who are more likely to be Republican, are happier than liberals, who are more likely to be Democrats. But even controlling for this ideological factor, a significant partisan gap remains. Conservative Republicans are happier than conservative Democrats, and moderate/liberal Republicans are happier than liberal Democrats. Hmmm, what other factors might be at play? Well, there's always...
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/301/are-we-happy-yet

Answer 8

I have far more respect for the 3 stooges. at least they didn't kill anyone...much less get away with it.

Answer 9

The stooges were at least amusing. Those other three are genuinely scary.

Answer 10

I know the biggest difference.

The 3 stooges are dead and Rove, Bush & Cheney are alive.