I don't know about wanted it to happen, but he knew. I asked how could all the intelligence about Iraq be so wrong. I got all the standard answers from the President's supporters, like, I guess the whole world's intelligence was wrong too. So once again all I can do is provide a link, and here it is.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,,716529,00.html
2007-05-08 09:54:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
All of the evidence was there and he should have responded. But remember who this is that we are talking about. He is supposed to be a grown man, let alone the top ranking head of state in the world. Yet he talks either in gibberish or like an eight year old: "I'm the Decider!" "Bring it on!" "I'm the Commander Guy!" It would really be hysterically funny if bush hadn't caused so much death and destruction in the world. Yes it is fair to blame him for not responding to 9/11 since he had all of the information and just had to put the pieces together. But realistically, you can't expect this "Commander Guy" to be capable of thinking logically and connecting the dots or for that matter, being really successful at anything that requires any effort. Even if a crisis is completely obvious, as with Hurricane Katrina, Bush and his string-pullers are not up to the task of dealing with it effectively.
2007-05-08 16:35:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Have you heard the latest? The newest theory is that Clinton set up the whole 9/11 thing to be pulled off after Bush was in office to make himself look better and so people wouldn't bug him about taking $8,000,000 in advance for a book that he has never written.
Go to www. wacko's.com. I'll post the details as soon as I get them made up. (the part about the book is true though. Hillary only got a paultry, what $2,000,000 ? for the book that she hasn't written yet. Makes me wonder if there isn't more to that story. Wouldn't you think if you paid that much money out and got no production, you might be just a little upset?)
For thinking people. The Bush admin. said they knew something was possibly in the works but could not pin point who/what/when/how/where. Makes sense since Clinton admin had the same info and couldn't do any better with it.
2007-05-08 17:01:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by DixeVil 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
I'm sure he did.. BUT i am also sure the us intelligense agencies also hear about 100 threats a day against us, it is a toss up to which are just BS and which will be carried out
Before homeland security came around.. the FBI and CIA did not share any of their information with each other each would do their own thing and not share resources.
Also Pres Bush is the executive, he's not a agent he gets daily reports and reads them, thats as far as he gets to go..
2007-05-08 16:33:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by lethander_99 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
when bush's father was in office, he knew some of the threats that came from saddam. we have been threatened by terrorist for YEARS and everyone has ignored the threats made, then everyone is shocked when it actually happens. now im not saying that our president is the best or the sharpest tool in the shed nor am i saying he is the dumbest, but this has been going on since his father was in office. everything was ignored, then when bush came into office it hit us. this all could have happened when clinton was in office. and i think we would have been looking at him the same way we are looking at bush. yes i think bush has made some wrong decisions and thing could have been different. but i dont think he is the only one who knew about terrorist attacks, this has been going on for years
2007-05-08 16:25:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by THE-KNoW 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
I have no doubt at all that Bush had NO foreknowledge of 911.
Yes I can refute that he knew and wanted it to happen because that would be easy because it is the truth.
You have no facts or anything that would stand up in court or anything close to reality to back up your point.
Thanks for the easy 2 points.
2007-05-08 16:23:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
That is just stupid. If he's all that he would of plant wmd's in Iraq and found them to shut everyone up along with Osama.
How bout he is sincerely fighting terrorism because it is at an all new level with an intensity for world domination.
2007-05-08 16:26:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Who's got my back? 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
While there are many conspiracy theorists, it's unreprehensible that any president would allow such an attack to occur. Plus, there is no good possible scenario to benefit from such an attack.
While I'm not a Bush fan, I do not think he would condone such atrocious acts on American people. We have lossed far more than we have gained from Sept. 11.
2007-05-08 16:22:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
There is no doubt in my mind that the Bush administration participated in - or, at the very least, - knew about the 9-11 tragedies and did nothing to stop them. -RKO- 05/08/07
2007-05-08 16:22:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
6⤊
4⤋
No, he and Condi were warned way before hand by intelligence and he just kept going on vacations.
2007-05-08 17:21:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋