They certainly don't seem interested in upholding the Constitution
They say impeachment is "off the table"
but it is their duty to uphold the Constitution
I find most of these fake Democrats very cowardly
They are proving Ralph Nader correct....their differences (the 2 corporate parties) are minimal.
2007-05-08 09:07:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Peace Warrior 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would also like to see them impeached, but I think the reasoning behind it is that it would be politicized as a power grab by Pelosi. I think the strategy is to bring to accountability their lies and deceit, so Americans will see that the Republican Administration and the Republicans who follow them are, in effect, worthless. This will allow for a Democratic President and Congress.
Unfortunately, this is a case where the ends has to justify the means, and impeachment is not a means to a justifiable ends.
2007-05-08 16:14:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by genmalia 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the democrat Congress has the majority by 1 It doesn't have enough votes for impeachment. 2/3 of congress has to agree to an impeachment. Furthermore on what grounds??? They only thing they can nail Bush for is the patriot act and they themselves voted for it.
As for Gonzales they would have to prove that the president was behind it.
2007-05-08 16:04:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by wondermom 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Why are you asking us? You should be asking your Congressional leaders.
And really, what's the point? Clinton proved that impeachment is a waste of time and money. It's a joke - kinda like a UN resolution. Personally, I'd be pissed of our govt wasted that kind of time and money on something so utterly useless.
2007-05-08 16:04:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jadis 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
He has betrayed the Constitution, an oath he placed his hand on the Bible and promised to uphold. He has allowed millions of illegals to enter this country along with the Clinton's and Bush senior. They plan to make a North American union and destroy our sovereignty. Our forefathers are spinning in their graves. They must think they will be able to spend their money in h-ll.
2007-05-08 16:21:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by jackie 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Have patience. Evidence is being gathered even as we speak. I think the investigation of Justice is just part of a larger scheme to finally lower the boom on Dubya and Company. You have noticed that the investigation is widening, not narrowing, have you not?
2007-05-08 16:10:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by MathBioMajor 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
See, even someone as dense as you should know that an impeachment would require that a crime be committed so if you can't point out a crime, shut up.
2007-05-08 16:11:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by libstalker 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
It would be smarter to impeach Cheney 1st.
This is Delphi short for Delphinea
2007-05-08 16:09:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by gone 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well here is another one that doesn't know how our government works!!! How about some charges? Yes that is the hold up, there is nothing to charge him with..
2007-05-08 17:32:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because there's no reason to impeach him. You have to have a legitimate reason for it first, not just political affiliation.
2007-05-08 16:05:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Delphi 2
·
2⤊
1⤋