English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i would love to be a glamour.. but i think im way too short for that. i am good at art and woundnt mind being a animator ( but i havnt got much patience for that) what would pay more?

2007-05-08 08:43:55 · 6 answers · asked by Wolfie 3 in Business & Finance Careers & Employment

6 answers

I think you should try out being an animator and although your attention span for something like that is very long, I think that if you stick with it and focus on it, you might end up liking it. Then once you've done that for a while, and have saved up enough money, try out the other profession.

2007-05-08 08:59:48 · answer #1 · answered by Colin S 2 · 0 0

it is really hard to hit the big time as a glamour, but if you could, it pays a lot. being an animator would be my choice because there are more possibilities and you still get payed a lot of money.

2007-05-08 15:50:59 · answer #2 · answered by DR soccer 1 · 0 0

You should be a lawyer unless you have kids if you have kids it will take up your time. You could maby be an artist it pays a lot! I don't think a midget wrestler.

P.S. A banker payes a lot 2.

2007-05-08 16:00:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Call girl

2007-05-08 15:49:08 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Bigglesworth 4 · 0 0

Be a midget wrestler.

2007-05-08 15:49:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

english teacher....wat job?????

2007-05-08 15:55:50 · answer #6 · answered by bjfb52 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers