Which job is better - current or new job?

Question

I work at a state university where there is a fairly standard rate of pay and benefits package, however, it is common for employees from one department within my university to be hired by another, which means that the benefits are maintained while income and job descriptions change. Here is my consideration: I work (job1) in a federal grant-funded program where pay does not match work responsibilities on par with the rest of the university, however, the minimum pay rate for a job opening (job 2) in another department for a similar position (but with more reasonable and attainable responsibilities) is slightly more (about $300) per year for one year of experience.
I have 5 years experience in the field and would require little training since I have completed many of these sorts of tasks at another university. Is a change of position worth the effort of applying? Also, another open position (job 3 - assistant dean) pays $7000 more, but the responsibilities look outrageous.

Err... Some of you are missing the irony about job 2: it's actually *more* pay for *fewer* AND *more easily attained* responsibilities, making it the easiest job of the three.

Another curve ball into the mix:
Job 1 would rank high on the order of "social responsibility" since it is focused on working with students with high needs levels.
Job 2 is more morally neutral and is more about preserving institutional standards. Some of my students would cross over, but I would have new students that could be far, far more advantaged. The position would require that I treat these students equally.
Job 3 is a substantial leap in responsibilities and constituents- potentially begging the old saw about "rising to the level of incompetence" - including a massive leap in management responsibilities.

Hehe. Coldrain, I would not have asked this question if the answer were so easy! The benefits package is hard to replace, let alone the environment or access to additional education (free tuition for me and my potential family). Without a substantial financial and time loss via another graduate degree, I'm not aware of any opportunities outside of academia for someone of my particular expertise.

Answer 1

OK, this one is not really about money: it's about frustration levels and being compensated for your efforts/responsibilities. As you describe it, job #2 much better suits you and your abilities and is better on the frustration level.
Is it worth the effort to apply for? In your case, definitely. If you are married or have a significant other, take it up with that person.
Job #3 is deffinitely out unless you are desperate for money. Remember: work smarter, not harder.
The most important factors in job consideration are the people you will be working with and the frustration levels. These affect not only your career, but your health and longevity.
Good luck.

Answer 2

Sounds to me that you should quit your current job, not going after the other two, and try to find a better job maybe outside of the University? Like you said "pay does not match work responsibilities". Why you want to continue down that road? I am sure there is a better job out there for you unless you have to stay in the University. If that's the case, then keep your current job. The other two do not look very attractive to me.

Answer 3

Are you willing to do more work just for a mere $300 more. Why not go for the gusto and apply for the Assist. Dean position at least you will know that you will be well compensated for it!

Answer 4

I dont know what your life style is like but if your more laid back you should just stay with what you have. Although I think you should look into the assistant dean job. It would be a great financal help. Good luck deciding.

Answer 5

i think 3 is best

but it is not our choice. it is your job and your life. do u want more salary and more responiblitys or less pay and less responiblities?

hope all goes well