Belushi!!
2007-05-08 08:26:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by diannegoodwin@sbcglobal.net 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
John Belushi
2007-05-08 08:32:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by fordperfect5 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would have to go with Belushi, he was just more versatile. He actually could act and did alot of physical work, where Farley was more in the same league as John Candy (who wasn't bad, but just not as good as Belushi was).
2007-05-08 22:29:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mitch 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
John Belushi! Hello?!? Have you ever seen the Blues Brothers or Animal House?
2007-05-08 08:27:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Belushi > Farley
2016-05-18 03:19:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chris Farley.
2007-05-08 08:34:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Belushi, I could only stand Chris Farley in small doses.
2007-05-08 08:28:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Stuck in the middle of nowhere 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Chris Farley, John was good but Chris was funny. Drugs got them both.
2007-05-08 08:28:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Witchy Woman 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Your kidding right! John Belushi of course.
But I do love Chris' work as well.
2007-05-08 08:28:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one will ever replace John Belushi!
2007-05-08 08:28:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋