would you rather be without arms or without legs?

Question

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=As7g14t68_bt3d9EIBGcnqrsy6IX?qid=20070508113729AAseMa9

Answer 1

Wow, that's tough. i'd have to say without legs. You can still get around with the help of a wheelchair, and you can still do things like type on a computer, eat lunch, play guitar.

With no arms, you can get around better, but you couldn't do things like open doors, or wipe your butt.

Answer 2

Legs. I can always get a wheel chair or artificial legs but no arms is kind of a drag.

Answer 3

If I HAD to, I would go without legs. I want to keep my arms so I can get and give hugs, applaud a job well done, and keep my job. LOL I'm a secretary. LOL

Answer 4

I think I would rather be without legs. I can't imagine not being able to hug my mom, my husband or my children. That and if I got an itch on my nose ....it would drive me crazy to not be able to itch it . hehehe

Answer 5

Without legs. Then I can get one of those cool electric chairs I've always wanted.

Answer 6

Let me keep one arm and one leg!

Answer 7

Haha, a fan of the "WYR" (Would You Rather)?

Id say, rather be without legs.

Answer 8

that's a hard question to answers because you need both.
but if i has to decide i would pick without legs

Answer 9

if i had to choose id go w/out legs..u cant do much w/out arms..cant cuddle ur kids or nuthin...so defo the legs

Answer 10

Without arms, I think.