English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In the following people. . . . . Harry Reid , Nancy Pelosi, John Murtha, Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama, and John Kerry .
Try to pick at least 2 or 3 of them . And if you want to call them names, like you do to us sometimes, feel free . I want you to be as comfortable as possible . That's what I'm here for isn't it. . . . to make Liberals more comfortable ? Smile !!

2007-05-08 07:05:58 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

You may not like my smartas$ remarks but you also did not answer the question . 6 out of 7 of the first Liberals to answer didn't answer(no surprise) and only one of them was honest enough to admit that we all have faults (btw, thank you Lame Duck) . This is an incredible testimony to what Conservatives say about Liberals. . . . and the funny thing is. . . . Liberals Wrote Their Own Testimonial !!

2007-05-08 07:26:42 · update #1

Note to Liberals : See Danny's answer . A clear answer and honest at that . So why can't the rest of you follow his lead ?

2007-05-08 07:28:23 · update #2

24 answers

All human beings are deeply flawed.

ALL of them.

2007-05-08 07:09:21 · answer #1 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 18 7

I'm a liberal, i think most of these peopel have bad plans for Iraq, we really can't just leave like they want us to. We need a strong dem in office so we can actually win this war just like the strong dems that one WWI, WWII, and Korea (with UN help). Obama has good ideas but he is not qualified for the office yet, he needs a couple more years in the senate first. Clinton has to much baggage to be a good leader. I'm going for Richardson. Well i answered, could you do the same about conservatives or are they all perfect?

2007-05-08 14:17:10 · answer #2 · answered by the 2nd woody 3 · 11 0

Harry Reid. I can't imagine what he was thinking when he said the war is lost while we have our young men out there in harms way. What a dope.

John Kerry. All he had to do was take a stand. I wanted someone to beat Bush in 2004, I was pulling for Dean, but Kerry blew it. His only appeal was the fact that he isn't George Bush. John Kerry is a tool.

Other than Clinton, I like the rest. I especially am a fan of Obama, I don't see what his faults are other than he's a smoker, and I see no reason to seek out faults. I prefer to be positive.

2007-05-08 14:14:09 · answer #3 · answered by Diggy 5 · 17 1

The biggest fault with Kerry and Gore is that they let Republicans define them and that they didn't immediately call bullsh*t on lies and smears like the Swittboat lie and the inventing the Internet hoax. My hope is that somebody like Obama or Clinton that doesn't take that crap and calls bs what it is gets the nomination.

2007-05-08 15:50:57 · answer #4 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 3 1

ok, here we go:
Harry Reid: Using Iraq war and Media to further his career for future. Basically an attn. whore.
Nancy Pelosi: Full of crap. She's more willing to sell her soul to the devil just so she can claim to be the first woman in her position. Overdoing her role.
John Murtha: Thinks his military service gives him a right to use the media to further his career.
Al Gore: Hypocrit, liar, full of hot air, would better be suited as a used car salesman.
Hillary: I actually kinda like her a bit. If we are going to have a female president, I think she would be a good start. I honestly believe she would push back if we were attacked.
Obama: Lack of experience, tries too hard to be everything to everybody so he ends up being nothing. Completely uninformed on the entire Iraq situation. The only reason he has made it as far as he has is by playing the race card.
John Kerry: He's about as trustworthy as a tuna salad sandwich in a hot car.

2007-05-08 14:48:28 · answer #5 · answered by Chrissy 7 · 6 5

Seriously...i applaud your effort to get the libs to formulate a coherent statement that actually answers the question...
Alas, we are again disappointed as Libs retreat from a definitive response in favor of the standard tactic of trash the audacious/outrageous/delusional//moronic/ individual to divert attention to the topic...
..Didn't know Yahoo hired trolls...thought they were just part of humanity ...Anybody know what the starting pays is???

2007-05-09 01:49:31 · answer #6 · answered by cyansure 4 · 3 1

Nancy.. even though the end result was good.. it is technically the presidents right to dictate foreign diplomats.. she overstepped her bounds a little there

Gore... should have fought harder for the presidency in '00 and should have had his "green" life in a little better order before he excepted the award.

Kerry... needs to realize that as a politician he's always in the public eye and not brush things off as a "joke".


now.. since I don't go off blasting Republicans.. rather policy normally.. does that mean I get to go and gripe about 3 of them now? :) :) :)

2007-05-08 14:14:50 · answer #7 · answered by pip 7 · 18 0

Harry Reid - Traitor
Nancy Pelosi - Mean Spirited
Al Gore - Sensationalist
Barak Obama - Slick Willy Jr.
Hillary Clinton - Mindless Poll Slave
John Kerry - Flip Flop
John Murtha - Uh who?

2007-05-08 14:25:59 · answer #8 · answered by William R 2 · 7 6

1.Harry Reid-Spineless wimp, if he wants to end the war do it, dont flap your mouth and release hot air angering Al Gore and the global warming nuts.
2.Nancy Pelosi-She has crazy eyes and too much plastic surgery, I dont know enough about her politics to say otherwise.Crazy eyes is enough for me.
3.John Murtha-dunno know much so I cant say.
4.Al Gore-Wicked boring to listen to him talk, too self involved.
5.Hillary Clinton-Right we need another Clinton in the White House, I really hope when my kids are born its still on the same cycle of retarded going Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton.
6.Obama-Who is this guy? No one.He is the great black hope for the Democrats, he'll burn out long before election time.
7.John Kerry-Jesus H Christ..stop going on TV, you make everything worse for the Democrats when you talk.

2007-05-08 14:18:58 · answer #9 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 9 4

I am trying to figure out what good name calling has ever done? It doesn't make the one who is doing the name calling feel better, nor does it win any points with the recipient.

2007-05-08 21:22:24 · answer #10 · answered by Me 7 · 1 2

Hating just based on party is extremely ignorant and shows a lack on any thinking. You have to be well informed on each side and each person. Until people are able to do that we won't have anyone good in office. Conservative or Liberal.

2007-05-08 14:15:27 · answer #11 · answered by atlantaboi3 5 · 12 1

fedest.com, questions and answers