If Bush could run again, would you vote for him in '08?

Question

I would. He is not the best president, but he is better than any of the other jokers running next year.

Answer 1

only, and i mean ONLY if he will do something about the illegals, criminals, weapons, and drugs flowing across the borders of america! and i mean action, not talk and no amnesty. i voted for him both times but i am pretty damn sick of him holding the doors wide open on our borders.

Answer 2

Absolutely NOT! His inept management of our military makes it imperative that he be replaced as soon as possible.

This war would have been OVER by now under any Republican or Democratic leader with any sense.

Declaring an ambiguous "War on Terror" was simply asinine. On September 12, 2001, he should have rallied the country to enlist in a war against known supporters of terror: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Palestine, Pakistan, Syria and any nation willing to side with them. Such a declaration would have been entirely justified and supported by our European allies, Russia and China. Can you imagine where we'd be today if we had gone into Saudi Arabia with ONE MILLION troops?

I'm sorry, but I must very strongly and respectfully disagree with the notion that President Bush is worthy of re-election. As a military leader and strategist, he has been nothing but an incompetent coward.

SHOPPING! HE TOLD US TO GO SHOPPING!!

That alone makes him a JACKASS and you want to re-elect him?????

Answer 3

If the Democrats ran John Kerry or Al Gore again, what choice would I have?

Seriously, though, even if the constitution were changed to allow a third term, I'd vote against the incumbent on principle. There shouldn't be three-term presidents.

Answer 4

Hell no.


8 years of George Bush running America and it's name through the mud is long enough. The idiot doesn't know what he's doing. He doesn't have a clear plan on anything. No Child Left Behind, what most people (I don't) call his greatest achievement yet isn't all the way planned out.

The man is handing over the tax dollars that you worked long and hard for to a foreign country who already has billions of dollars of your money from their oil wells. He's sending your sons and daughters to unstable countries to die at the hands of a car bomb. He's taking away what say so you have in this country, turning us into a Dictatorship.


So, no. I would rather die at the spot than have another 4 years of George Bush in the White House. America was dumb the first time they voted him in the first time, and fooled retards the second time.

Answer 5

Actually I could not find it in my heart to vote for this POS in 2000 and could not do it in 2004 either!

The man is pure evil! I realized this in 2000 when I tried to find his soul by looking into his eyes - and didn't find any!

And so far Bush has proved me right!

Answer 6

Yes I would. I have to say that the number of people on here that say they would vote for him again don't really give an accurate depiction of his popularity polls. Maybe the media is not being entirely truthful about what his popularity rating really is. Go figure. I don't trust the liberal media.

Answer 7

I couldn't vote for him in '04 because of his dismal performance in the area of deficit spending, and since not much has changed with the deficit (other than getting bigger) he wouldn't get my vote again.

Answer 8

yes, but to be shot out of a cannon, not for president of the United States

Answer 9

Probably not but if the Democrats pick the same type of candidates they nominated in 2000 and 2004 I might be forced to.

Answer 10

In a NY minute. President Bush has done a fine job and just because some left overs from the 60's wish it was the summer of love again, I'm not changing my mind. I think GWB will go down in history as one of our finest presidents.