Definitely with the budget cuts and re-appropriation of funds else where like into Halliburton's pockets for the BlackWater USA mercenary army in Iraq. Bush dismantled FEMA and that was exposed over New Orleans prior to the list of floods and Tornado's across the Country. Yes Bush approval ratings are 28% for a reason, and this is one of the reasons. American tax payers have already paid into disaster relief that Bush has embezzled the funding from.
2007-05-08 08:11:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by leonard bruce 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
basically there is not any information on the 'information' approximately what's happening in Iraq. each and every now and then you spot that nicely time-honored movie clip exhibiting the comparable marines breaking down the comparable door and then there is that previous buzz approximately how we killed the huge style 2 guy. sometimes some ordinary gets onTV and say how nicely each and every thing is going, yet you will nicely be certian he has his hands crossed at the back of his returned while he's asserting it. In actual existence the 'Vichy Iraq' government has no actual authority, little or no skill and for the main area that's staffed by ability of hacks hiding out in fortress green Zone hoping that they'd sidestep the subsequent incoming mortar around. The actual infrastructure of Iraq is finished #$%$, very nearly all the knowledgeable all people is the two in another usa or hiding out hundreds of miles from the place they used to stay under assumed names. there is fewer killings via fact very nearly everyon slated to be killed is already lifeless. The sunnis are being bribed with borrowed US forex to not shoot at our troops. The shiites are waiting for the U. S. to flow away so as that they'd wipe out the sunnis and the so stated as Iraqi defense force are ineffective. meanwhile the U. S. taxpayer is calling on the Bush Junta borrow further and extra money to maintain this crackpot theory going and the GOP needs previous guy McCain to %. up the place George Bush leaves off. all people is killed and maimed time-honored for not something. while this began our forces became mercenaries for the Oil Mafia and none of that has replaced. Iraqi oil became into meant to pay for all of this mess and the U. S. became into meant to be 'safer'. that did not take place. the huge question is...why in the hell hasn't Bush and something of his posse of degenerate reactionaries been arrested, fee, convicted and sent up? Oh, nicely...that probably does not have made the 'information' the two.
2016-10-15 02:48:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well of course it does, that goes just by the obvious. I tend to say it isn't going to effect it as badly as some want to believe it is. Even the Governor admitted that surrounding cities and communities would help in the cause but she was just mad about the fact it was the case that their equipment and personel are in Iraq for no reason when they should be in the US to help.
2007-05-08 06:11:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by bs b 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. The statement given by the Kansas polititian was more a snipe at current national policy than emergency response. I suspect there is more than enough resources available through state channels.
2007-05-08 05:52:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by xtowgrunt 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, we still have more of our military in the US than in any other country.
2007-05-08 06:02:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by gerafalop 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Without question.
2007-05-08 05:49:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋