source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070507/ap_on_he_me/biotech_michael_j__fox;_ylt=Aqwm0wttFQqYvkXxKgqOi6ha24cA
2007-05-08 03:46:56 · 7 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well yeah, he's compassionate for you... If you are a clump of cells, wealthy, or a military contractor.
Otherwise, you're on your own.
2007-05-08 03:57:42 · answer #1 · answered by ck4829 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Only embryonic. Stem cell research is still being done. Duh, not performing tests on embryonic stem cells IS conservative. So is wanting to veto any laws that provide Federal funding for abortions. (which federal and state funding for abortions is allowed in cases of rape, incest, and medical conditions. some states even help low income women)
2007-05-08 11:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by Jasmine 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The conservitive party is compasionate with the unborn and those of military age in between there is hardly any compassion...cuts on wic, medicaid, school funding...etc
2007-05-08 11:09:55 · answer #3 · answered by emt_dragon339 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He isn't against adult stem cell research, he is compassionate.
2007-05-08 11:10:06 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He vetoed embryonic stem cell research!!! Not stem cell! Embryonic hasn't had any success anyways. So please get your facts straight!
2007-05-08 11:05:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because he is compassionate toward innocent babies lives, not to those, who would take a babies life to heal themselves.
2007-05-08 11:01:02 · answer #6 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He is a conservative?
2007-05-08 10:57:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋