English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WHAT was the reason for the US involvement in Vietnam War? and now on going Middle East War ? Where is the weapon of mass Destruction ?? If no such thing, why BUSH has not been hanged for violating the UN Law?

2007-05-08 03:18:03 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

5 answers

Yep, there is that sound again. It's that distinctive sound of someone beating a dead horse. I almost hope a Democrat gets elected so I can start making the same argument over and over and over again.
Was there WMD in Iraq? None found yet. If it was a ploy, why did many Democrats think there was WMD's in Iraq and why did they vote for the war?

Our involvement in Vietnam was part of the cold war and to show that America would not stand for any type of Communist takeover. The REAL issue with Vietnam was that the politicians at home try to run the war instead of letting us kick *** like we know how to do. I mean, who sends people to war then says "don't bomb them"...

2007-05-08 03:25:04 · answer #1 · answered by Colonel 6 · 3 0

Vietnam was to prevent the domino theory. That is as one country in the Far East goes Communist it was thought they would all fall one after another. We were there to prevent this.

The current Middle East war, no matter what else you have heard is for two reasons. The first is that Saddam Husseing threatened the life of the Senior President Bush and junior wanted revenge. Second, Iraq sits on the second largest pool of oil on Earth. With oil men in the White House it stands to reason they want to secure that for their oil company buddies.

The Weapons of Mass Destruction were destroyed in the first Gulf War. Any that may have existed afterward were useless.
While these weapons did exist in Iraq at one time they did not exist in 2001 and beyond.

As for the last of your questions, there may be a war crimes trial after Bush and Cheney leave office on January 20, 2009. The result of that trial may be as you suggest. It will be up to the international court to determine that.

2007-05-08 03:27:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Question #1: The official line is that we were there to support "democracy" and defeat communism.

Question #2: The official line is that we are there to support "democracy" and spread it.

Question #3: I don't know where they are.

Question #4: Even assuming there aren't any WMD's to be found, Bush is not subject to "UN Law" and neither should anyone else be. The President of the United States is subject to the people who elect him, not the statists of other countries.

2007-05-08 03:28:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

And here I thought this was going to be an actual question to answer and not another asinine political diatribe.

Silly me.

2007-05-08 03:31:53 · answer #4 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 0 0

'Cause we don't HANG folks no more...

2007-05-08 03:26:00 · answer #5 · answered by Jenaberry 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers