Russia is sliding back into totalitarianism.
Iran is developing a nuclear bomb and promising to wipe Israel off the map.
Hugo Chavez has becoming dictator of Venezuela and this is having an increasingly evident domino effect in the region.
Pakistan has nuclear weapons and lead by a tenuous government.
Point being, with the world in the state it is we should stand behind our leader instead of ridiculing him. This shows division and instability to our enemies abroad (and yes ladies and gentleman, we have enemies out there who hate President Clinton just as much as President Bush).
George W. Bush is not a conservative though. He has acted like a Democrat in many regards (prescription drug coverage, No-Child-Moves-Ahead). So in a way George W. Bush has helped the Republican party because we will now seek out a truly right wing conservative and they WILL win.
2007-05-08 02:52:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by gayconservativ 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
George Bush is the worst President in my lifetime. Tying Iraq to 9/11 and starting a war over non existent WMD's. Inherited a surplus and now has created unprecedented deficits. FISA-Gate, Plame-Gate, Katrina-Gate, Advocating a constitutional amendment to guarantee second class citizenship for an entire class of Americans. Flying to DC from Texas in the middle of his vacation to sign the Teri Schivao bill because he 'values life' but started a war, and has signed hundreds of Death warrants.
The biggest lie: That he restored integrity to the Whitehouse. Willful stubbornness that has cost the lives of thousands while pandering to right wing fascists that would strip everyone not just like them of American freedoms is hardly the mark of integrity.
2007-05-08 03:16:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by jehen 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am anti-Bush. I believe the biggest lie the other side propagates is that Democrats are weak and would "surrender" or "lose" the "war" in Iraq and that the "terrorists will follow us to our shores" if Democrats are elected. The truth is that any Democrat would retaliate against any enemy that attacked us and not stop until the enemy was destroyed. They would not lose focus like Bush and Co. did by invading Iraq with misleading (at best) information disseminated to the American people.
2007-05-08 02:50:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Arbgre555 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
well, for starters,
Bush leveraged a national tragedy into reelection. He’s seeded the federal government with true believers, expanded executive authority while marginalizing Congress and appointing 2 radically conservative SC judges. He’s expanded government surveillance of our phones, e-mails, library borrowings, bank accounts and medicine cabinets. He’s stalled efforts to curb global warming, cut protections once provided by the EPA, FDA, and silenced scientists who dare refute the literal word of bible or the backward beliefs of those who claim to know the mind of the almighty. The US can now torture, imprison without providing cause and prosecute without allowing a reasonable defense. He’s built bases in the middle east, and fattened the bank accounts of those whose bank accounts were already obscene. The middle class — the masses — have not been so economically impotent in decades.
2007-05-08 02:51:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am anti-Bush because of his War on American Ideals and Freedom.
The biggest lie told by Bush's side is "we must sacrifice our freedoms for the security of the country"..I laughed my *** off when after he started this whole safety in xchange for rights he tried to give control of American ports to FOREIGN companies.
to the "he stand up unlike a spineless blah blah blah" people..you have a very good point but remember it is a VERY fine line between standing ground and stubborn jackhole
2007-05-08 02:55:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anti- because he and his Bushiots are a disgrace to humanity.
Their biggest lie is that the tax cuts for millionaires helps the economy. Were that true and our economy in such great shape, why aren't we paying for the Iraq War right now with all the extra money supposedly being generated by those tax cuts?!
2007-05-08 02:50:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ben 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I know there are plenty of far left idiots that hate the President's guts. I know there are plenty of people who don't agree with him. That's why I am pro-Bush because he don't back down to no one. He didn't roll over for the terrorists like a Clintoon would. He is standing firm and going toe to toe with them unlike a spineless liberal i.e. Clintoon.....
2007-05-08 02:49:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
your question would be easier to answer had you asked what lie they haven't propagated.
i support our president - right or, wrong.
why? because unlike the pussy-willow who previously held his office, he has at least taken a stance and held steadfastly to it.
the pussy-willow was too concerned with watching the polls and maintaining his popularity rating to take any stand that might be deemed controversial, knowing that he could just hand off the problem of increasing terrorism to the next incumbent.
2007-05-08 02:54:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am anti bush, and the biggest lie is, we are safer today than the day he took office.
2007-05-08 02:50:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by smedrik 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
in case you're under 30 and not a liberal, you have not have been given from now on have been given a heart. in case you're over 30 and not conservative, you have not have been given from now on have been given a concepts. i'm chuffed which you're excited approximately politics, extra advantageous young ones must be. to respond on your questions: i like Bush by ability of ability of fact he's a guy of conviction, he isn't based upon the latest pollto tell him what he would have faith...that's what congress is for. i do in assessment to Bush by ability of ability of fact he's a foul communicator, he isn't articulate, and he seems stupid even in spite of the very incontrovertible fact that he gets subjects genuine. 9/11 made me like Bush extra advantageous by ability of ability of fact if we had a pathetic appeaser like Kerry in determination to artwork 9/11 would have been the commencing up of distinctive assaults on the U.S. we've not had any and you'd be able to need to grant Bush some credit for our secure practices. If we weren't in a conflict Bush would probably be approximately as ineffective as Clinton became into. i'm conservative, so a Reagan republican or a JFK democrat. Bush is helpful, yet historic previous will evaluate him a brilliant president by ability of ability of company of a specialist-western democracy indoors the middle of the middle east. Bush has helped our u . s . a . by ability of employing protecting taxes low and thereby helping the economic kit and small company. He has helped us stay possibility-loose by ability of employing assurance such by ability of ability of fact the Patriot Act and hard line against terrorism. we are in a conflict genuine now by ability of ability of fact it extremely is the staggering element to do for the destiny. If the terrorists get extra advantageous suited weapons, extra advantageous money, and bigger ability than you would be able to locate your self drafted to attempt against in a destiny conflict against terrorist helping governments alongside with Iran. Our protection stress is all volunteer it extremely is in assessment to previous wars. We attempt against now to ward off one thousand's of protection stress and civilian deaths later. As you grow to be older you will discover that the international desires presidents like Bush to undo the placed on and tear and tear that presidents like Clinton have achieved. stay enthusiastic about politics and get as knowledgeable as you ought to so as which you will make knowledgeable judgements mutually because it consists of politics. good fulfillment
2016-10-15 02:27:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋