I came across a line in the yahoo headlines stating that the brightest and biggest supernova ever witnessed by human civilization has many extraordinary traits, including that it did not form into a black hole... This doesn't make sense to me. Anybody have an explanation?
2007-05-08
01:53:30
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space
Billy, as far as i know nuetron stars don't collapse and not become black holes. Once degenerate nuetron pressure is exceeded no known force in nature can prevent a singularity from forming.
Maybe you can illustrate your points a little bit clearer, because as it stands i don't know what your trying to say.
heres the link to the article that sparked my question;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070507/ap_on_sc/supernova
2007-05-08
03:47:41 ·
update #1
Haratu, your point holds in some instances, there is alot of lost material, however it only takes about 8 or so solar masses in a collapse to form a singularity. The star which astronomers are looking at now is 150 solar masses, and black holes are expected to result from supernova's with less than half that mass easily. This is an oddity, I've never heard of it.
2007-05-08
03:53:53 ·
update #2