omg. have you seen how everyone dances around the question.. LOL not one answered the question about if its natural. why are our bodies designed to be used on the opposite sex LOL its so funny there is NO answer to that except using our bodies for same sex ... SEX IS unnatural... tab A is meant for slot B. period. but if you are gay. you will find any way to rationalize what yo do. period. scientifically it has not been PROVEN that it is genetic that you are born gay. it may be INFERRED .. but one article i read about some guy who did a study. said his results were misinterpreted to say it WAS genetic. bottom line. even if it was PROVEN that there is NO genetic link. people will still be gay because that's what they want to do. period. .. can you love someone of the same sex.. absolutely. you Can love anyone at all. but is it natural to have same sex relationships NO.. in nature. anything that is meant to exist can recreate it self. if you put all gays on one island and all lesbians on another . and let them live happily. they would be wiped out. but again. it will all be rationalized anyway. so it matters not. i don't have anything against gays. but i Will not argue that it is a natural thing to be. as it isn't..
2007-05-08 02:27:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Homer 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
The best way I can explain this is:
1) Animals must reproduce either asexually or sexually. In our case, it is sexually, so we all got assigned either A or B body part. We don't have to use it for reproduction, however.
Some people remain celibate and never reproduce. Some people, like me, are straight and married, but decided not to reproduce. Some people just cannot reproduce. So their body parts do them no good for reproducing - yet they have them. (Just like most of us are born with appendices - but we don't use them and sometimes they kill us.)
2) Perhaps there are more objectives that a species is suppose to accomplish besides reproducing. (A very simple example: Vultures eat dead things which is good because it cleans up the area!) Most if not all animals have a certain percentage that are gay, and this has happened since "the beginning of time".
3) Not everyone's body IS set up for the other sex. Some have no easily definable organs that say it is a "boy" or "girl". Some have BOTH sets of organs. Some people end up having the organs of one sex but should have had the organs of the other sex. So there are many more "sexes" than you think.
Just like life, it is never as simple as you thought it would be once you look into it.
2007-05-09 09:42:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tina Goody-Two-Shoes 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
One study says that women who might carry the "gay gene" are more fertile than those without, thus even though it raises the chances they'll have a gay child, it also raises their fertility.
As for the rest, you could argue a man or woman are built to be able to have intercourse with any other species, so why not do that? I mean other animals have penises and so forth.
Anyways though, there is no harm to the body if sex is done properly, same like in heterosexual intercourse.
Also, just because my body is made to fit a certain mold doesn't mean my mind is. So in this case, engaging in heterosexual sex is fine for my body because that's what it's built for, but it's not fine for my mind.
Being gay is just another variant, the way I see it Nature makes us all very diverse, this is another way that we're diverse, it has no way of knowing you cannot reproduce with the same gender, but it's covering that base anyways, and in doing so also builds in a way to control population growth.
Also, if you're arguing reproduction, then old people and barren people don't make sense either, they just shouldn't exist, there is no point to them as they cannot at all reproduce naturally. They should just be dead at that point. But they're not, so it means there's more to nature than multiplication of species, it's only humans that have tried so hard to second guess it. Humans are twisting what is considered natural to fit their definition, rather than observing nature and then drawing conclusions.
2007-05-08 02:33:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Luis 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have to admit, this is quite a difficult one to answer. Krusty is right though. Gay sex isn't something natiral, but sex is. And I have to agree that sex does cause reproduction, but it doesn't only have to be about reproduction. We do have sex for pleasure, but more than that, we do it becasue we love one another, not too fifferent from hetero's. Most straight people these days have sex because they want to show their love and affection for the one they love. Water is made for us to drink away our thirst, yet we also use it to wipe away dirt, and make things churn. Rocks and minerals are for us to stand on, yet we wear them on our fingers and ears(and many other places). No, gay sex isn't natural. But sex is, and for us, that's all we're having sex, making love. We don't consider it gay sex, so why should you? Oh yeah, well I don't call it hetero sex, or straight sex when you do it, I just call it sex because it's something that everyone does in some time of their life. Because it's something natural. I'm sorry if I didn't make much sense, this was just kind of a difficult one to answer for such a simple question. I hope it helps though^_^
2007-05-09 14:10:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know ,the feelings just come's natural for them .u said especially females but its like some women are born barren meaning they cant get pregnant,I think the reason why some women are like this is because there ovules are abnormal.what u herd about gay people is not true they don't hurt each other because they want sex with other men(I think u ment that gay guys want sex with men).Just because ur alive dosnt mean gay people dosnt exsit,its like there are some straight people and and may be even some bisexual people that has children. I think most people are straight and most straight people do have childern
u say ur live for reproduction ,so keep in mind that not all women wants to have a child so if u gets married she might not want a child.please don't take what i said wrong, I just wanted to be helpful.
2007-05-07 21:50:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by getaknocking 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay, the deal is, when people say that homosexuality is naturally occuring, they mean just that the attraction to the same gender is ingrained at birth, either by a gene, brain development, or some other biological factor. I'll agree with you to the extent that two bodies of the same gender are not best equipped to express love. What this means is that homosexuality is something of a "fluke of nature", it is naturally occuring but in the same sense that autism is naturally occuring. That is, looking at it from a evolutionist stance, it wasn't efficient of nature to create that, but it happened by chance. With homosexuals the brain didn't form the "standard" way that most other brains of people within that sex formed. Within any species, not all of its members reproduce, or are capable of reproduction. Unfortunately for humans, only the stupidest of us tend to breed.
P.S. I'm sorry for comparing homosexuality to autism.
2007-05-08 04:06:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by lordwashu13 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow you're an idiot! I've been with men and have children. My heart wasn't there and now I'm with my partner. She can pleasure me more than any man ever could. Why does it need to be about body parts in particular? She's never hurt me or vise versa.
Not everything is related to reproduction. I hold a job, pay bills and taxes, eat and drink...all things are not related to reproduction. As for the asking why I'm alive....well that's simple some one decided to have sex. I didn't choose to be here and I doubt my parents said hey let's have a child so she can reproduce.
Love is natural. I love my partner and she loves me. We aren't together for the reproduction factor but if we were there are plenty of other ways to have children. We don't require the "all mighty" man. He's just a pain in @ss anyway.
2007-05-15 05:42:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Girly Girl 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
via fact merely like with any element else in existence, there's a line between what God meant to be proper and organic, and what isn't organic, and is morally incorrect, and is vulgar. There are extremes that are so foul, and so profane, that are sinful. like the rest, you are able to take it to three distance. that's why there's a line. If sins of different human beings does not have profaned it to start with, it might nevertheless be in an excellent mild. The Bible says, "there is in basic terms one sin, that has effects on the physique, and that's sexual sin". inspect Aides and all the different issues floating around obtainable. You tell me.....................
2016-10-15 02:05:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mens bodies have a prostate. The prostate makes men have an orgasm. The only way to reach a prostate is through their anus. This could be reached with a long thin PENIS shaped subject--Interesting little tidbit, no?
This is your body. Why is it there? It's natural.
Obviously there is more than one option for the human body to have sex.
Also, men and women who have sex with one another could hurt each other as well. It isn't just same sex couples. A man can hurt a woman in many ways.. hitting the cervix, being too rough or too big, not enough lube. That goes with anal sex for same sex couples as well. It works both ways, pal.
2007-05-07 22:58:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by shawn 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Foremostly, I couldn't give you a straight answer because your sentences are too complicated. Is that English? I can see that your trying to point on something but never get there... I just wonder how krusty was able to answer that... Are you also krusty?? LOL
2007-05-14 21:34:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋