the greeks?

Question

what is the relation between the greeks and the egyptians??

Answer 1

Perfectly OK. If you mean how we get along.
If you are asking if there is any connection between the 2 people historically, there is none, apart from the fact that Alexander the great conquered Egypt, where they saw him like a god, and when he died his general Ptolemeos inherited the kingdom of Egypt, and his grand-daughter Kleopatra was also Greek, basically. And there has been a Greek community in Alexandria (the city Alexander built in Egypt) until recently.

Answer 2

i don't know if i get your question right but we do have a good relation with the Egyptians as we used to have in the past. the egyptian and the greek civilization were amongst the first ones in our planet having a close cultural and commercial relationship even in the antiquity. with Alexander the Great started a period when Greeks even moved to Egypt to live there and even now there are many Greeks living in Egypt....

Answer 3

I like them as people in general. I've met a few Egyptians and have had very friendly relations with them. I've never travelled to Egypt, but met them in a few in different places.
Don't forget Egypt was Greek a looong time ago and it lies very close to Greece geographically. I have Cretan origins and Crete as close to Egypt as it is to Athens, this must mean at least something.
If you're talking about politics, i believe their realtions to be fine, nothing very special but there is no dispute or major alliance of any kind.
Where are you from btw?

Answer 4

The best...The greeks had always good relations with the arabs, and with the egyptians.Dont forget the greek comunities in Cairo and Alexandria, the Patriarcate, and how many greeks worked there and created families, their comunity, and contributed also into the economy of the country.
Today also, the egyptians are wellcome in our country, and generally the muslim minority is living well in Greece without causing any problem.The opposite, they have shops, and they work with dignity..

Answer 5

your question should be, IS there a relation between the greeks and the egyptians. and the answer would be :not really.( that's my opinion, others might say there is)

Answer 6

We both had the Greatest civilizations in the past

we made monuments and we both created history!

Deep respect is what influences us both for each other!

More over we are connected in many ways! Our geographical position make the communication and the interactive relation possible and productive!

We have many commons in food, music and culture as we do with Turkish people too

Regards from Greece

Answer 7

They both share the Mediterranean, only on different sides.

Answer 8

These are the researches of Herodotus of Halicarnassus, which he publishes, in the hope of thereby preserving from decay the remembrance of what men have done, and of preventing the great and wonderful actions of the Greeks and the Barbarians (Meaning the Phoenicians) from losing their due meed of glory; and withal to put on record what were their grounds of feud.

The Phoenicians Began the Quarrel

1. According to the Persians best informed in history, the Phoenicians began the quarrel. This people, who had formerly dwelt on the shores of the 'Indian Ocean' (Note: Herodotus unproven assumption of a geographical region unknown to him), having migrated to the Mediterranean and settled in the parts which they now inhabit (also unproven assumption), began at once, they say, to adventure on long voyages, freighting their vessels with the wares of Egypt and Assyria. They landed at many places on the coast, and among the rest at Argos, which was then pre-eminent above all the states included now under the common name of Hellas. Here they exposed their merchandise, and traded with the natives for five or six days; at the end of which time, when almost everything was sold, there came down to the beach a number of women, and among them the daughter of the king, who was, they say, agreeing in this with the Greeks, Io, the child of Inachus. The women were standing by the stern of the ship intent upon their purchases, when the Phoenicians, with a general shout, rushed upon them. The greater part made their escape, but some were seized and carried off. Io herself was among the captives. The Phoenicians put the women on board their vessel, and set sail for Egypt. Thus did Io pass into Egypt, according to the Persian story, which differs widely from the Phoenician: and thus commenced, according to their authors, the series of outrages.

Cretans Abduct the King of Tyre's Daughter

2. At a later period, certain Greeks, with whose name they are unacquainted, but who would probably be Cretans, made a landing at Tyre, on the Phoenician coast, and bore off the king's daughter, Europe. In this they only retaliated; but afterwards the Greeks, they say, were guilty of a second violence. They manned a ship of war, and sailed to Aea, a city of Cochins, on the river Phasis; from whence, after dispatching the rest of the business on which they had come, they carried off Medea, the daughter of the king of the land. The monarch sent a herald into Greece to demand reparation of the wrong, and the restitution of his child; but the Greeks made answer, that having received no reparation of the wrong done them in the seizure of Io the Argive, they should give none in this instance.

Priam Procures Greek Wife by Violence

3. In the next generation afterwards, according to the same authorities, Alexander the son of Priam, bearing these events in mind, resolved to procure himself a wife out of Greece by violence, fully persuaded, that as the Greeks had not given satisfaction for their outrages, so neither would he be forced to make any for his. Accordingly he made prize of Helen; upon which the Greeks decided that, before resorting to other measures, they would send envoys to reclaim the princess and require reparation of the wrong. Their demands were met by a reference to the violence which had been offered to Medea, and they were asked with what face they could now require satisfaction, when they had formerly rejected all demands for either reparation or restitution addressed to them.

Acts of Violence

4. Hitherto the injuries on either side had been mere acts of common violence; but in what followed the Persians consider that the Greeks were greatly to blame, since before any attack had been made on Europe, they led an army into Asia. Now as for the carrying off of women, it is the deed, they say, of a rogue; but to make a stir about such as are carried off, argues a man a fool. Men of sense care nothing for such women, since it is plain that without their own consent they would never be forced away. The Asiatics, when the Greeks ran off with their women, never troubled themselves about the matter; but the Greeks, for the sake of a single Lacedaemonian girl, collected a vast armament, invaded Asia, and destroyed the kingdom of Priam. Henceforth they ever looked upon the Greeks as their open enemies. For Asia, with all the various tribes of barbarians that inhabit it, is regarded by the Persians as their own; but Europe and the Greek race they look on as distinct and separate.

Phoenician Side of the Story

5. Such is the account which the Persians give of these matters. They trace to the attack upon Troy their ancient enmity towards the Greeks. The Phoenicians, however, as regards Io, vary from the Persian statements. They deny that they used any violence to remove her into Egypt; she herself, they say, having formed an intimacy with the captain, while his vessel lay at Argos, and perceiving herself to be with child, of her own freewill accompanied the Phoenicians on their leaving the shore, to escape the shame of detection and the reproaches of her parents. Whether this latter account be true, or whether the matter happened otherwise, I shall not discuss further. I shall proceed at once to point out the person who first within my own knowledge inflicted injury on the Greeks, after which I shall go forward with my history, describing equally the greater and the lesser cities. For the cities which were formerly great, have most of them become insignificant; and such as are at present powerful, were weak in the olden time. I shall therefore discourse equally of both, convinced that human happiness never continues long in one stay.

Notes

The mention of the author's name and country in the first sentence of his history seems to have been usual in the age in which Herodotus wrote.
Herodotus knew the Red Sea and confused the name of the Indian Ocean with Erythraean Sea.
The ancient superiority of Argos is indicated by the position of Agamemnon at the time of the Trojan war (compare Thucyd. i. 9-10), and by the use of the word Argive in Homer for Greek generally. No other name of a single people is used in the same generic way.
The name, thus first brought before us in its Asiatic form, may perhaps furnish an astronomical solution for the entire fable; for as the wanderings of the Greek Io have been often compared with the erratic course of the moon in the heavens, passing in succession through all the signs of the zodiac, so do we find that in the ante-Semitic period there was also an identity of name, the Egyptian title of the moon being Yah, and the primitive Chaldaean title being represented by a Cuneiform sign, which is phonetically Ai, as in modern Turkish.
Since no other Greeks were thought to have possessed a navy in these early times.
Aristophanes in the Acharnians (488-494) very wittily parodies the opening of Herodotus' history. Professing to give the causes of the Peloponnesian war, he says: -
- "This was nothing,
Smacking too much of our accustomed manner
To give offence. But here, sirs, was the rub:
Some sparks of ours, hot with the grape, had stol'n
A mistress of the game - Simaetha named -
From the Megarians: her doughty townsmen
(For the deed moved no small extent of anger)
Reveng'd the affront upon Aspasia's train,
And bore away a brace of her fair damsels.
All Greece anon gave note of martial prelude.
And what the cause of war? marry, three women."

-Mitchell, p. 70-2. This is the earliest indication of a knowledge of the work of Herodotus on the part of any other Greek writer.

The claim made by the Persians to the natural lordship of Asia was convenient as furnishing them with pretexts for such wars as it suited their policy to engage in with non-Asiatic nations.
It is curious to observe the treatment which the Greek myths met with at the hands of foreigners. The Oriental mind, quite unable to appreciate poetry of such a character, stripped the legends bare of all that beautified them, and then treated them, thus vulgarized, as matters of simple history.
Thucydides remarks on the small size to which Mycenae had dwindled compared with its former power (i. 10).
Excerpted from Book 1, Chapters 1-5, in The History of Herodotus, George Rawlinson, ed. and tr., vol. 1 (New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1885)
Reproduced without permission from http://www.shsu.edu/~his_ncp/PhoenGr.html