is there a machine that puts out more energy then it takes in.?

Question

im asking because i think i might know how to create one using magnets. it would produce energy as long as magnets exert a force. i just want to know if someone has already thought of it or of something simulare. if you know anything about this please let me know.

Answer 1

yes...well, no,...well, yes... well, sort of.

You can't actually build a MACHINE that maximizes the energy, but you can have continuous energy without much energy, as in superconducting magnets.

Example:
One of the laws of thermodynamics says that energy can't incerase or decrease.

Example:
Fermilab (yay fermilab) uses a superconducting collider to power the acceleration in its tevatron. A system of superconducting magnets (without any batteries) push particles, which accelerates them, until they get close to the speed of light.

Flaw:
the superconducting magnets only work under a certain temperature. so if you can face the cold, then you can accelerate the bold. (i know it doesn't make sense, but it rhymes!)

Answer 2

No. There is a law called the conservation of energy. You must put energy in to get energy out, and the energy you get out is equal to that which you put in (in a closed system). However, we never have a totally isolated system, so it really is not possible. If you're thinking of spinning a magnet in a vacuum, such as space , or a man made one, it will take more energy to start the magnet spinning and sustain the vacuum than you will get. Besides that, a magnet creates an electrical current, which will in turn create a magnetic field, which will affect you're spinning magnet (if thats what you were planning on doing). Also, over a period of time, a magnet loses its power.

Answer 3

No, there are many designs for perpetual motion machines, but none work in practice. You can't get more energy out of system than you put in; first law of thermodynamics. There are tons of perpetual motion designs on Wikipedia, many involving magnets. Yours has most likely been attempted before. The important thing to remember is that magnetic fields do no work.

Answer 4

Hello

Yes, there is many machinnes delivers more output energy than in its input and are commons, such as: hidraulic turbine generators, wind generators, sun panels energy, oil generators,etc,.....in all that systems output is more greater than input thinking in input as "The energy you insert in the system" for example in a oil generator you need a little energy for get the spark for start the explosion an start the generator

Of the same way if you think in magnets as the "fuel" for power an electric generator is the same case, permanent magnet generator are since begins of 1960 Adams motor-generator was the firsts modern versions, then becomes Newman, Ed-Gray, Bedini, etc,......you can extract magnetic energy from magnets using the back emf method get unlimitied free energy from a magnetic field in a mobile machinne, or get free energy of a static device as the Tom Bearden MEG without mobile parts

Magnetic fields as electrical or gravity fields have the propiety of autogeneration and in common machinnes that propiety is not used

But this free energy devices as the common used machinnes don't violates the energy conservation law, the only difference is than the fuel is not conventional and unlimitied, but follow the general equation


Einput + Eexternal agent - Elosses = Eoutput


In this case Eexternal agent is the magnetical incoming energy from space, if you don't go in consideration of this term COP = Eoutput / Einput > 1 thinking than incoming energy is only your energy inserted in the system, but in really that incoming energy is Einput + Eexternal agent , then if there is losses in the system as usually is present the real COP of any free energy machinne is less than 1, the same result from conventional machinnes
I was in the past in a company we send too many of this machinnes to many companies in the world, if you need more details for build some of this devices you can send an email for the following deleting WITHOUTTHIS

[e-mail]



Bye

Answer 5

Do not be discouraged by the naysayers or the fact that it has never been done - if you think you have an idea of how to attain perpetual motion with magnets, give it a whirl and try to construct a prototype. If nothing else, it will be a great learning experience. And who knows, it might even work.
Good luck.

Answer 6

I know there is, there have been many made in the past , the problem is governments, big business , don't want it, also the education system (government) holds people back by teaching them non truth. open your mind people, look around, become free energy researchers. there are many sites to research from. all the best, oh don't let people hold you back try out your ideas. it all adds to your learning!!

Answer 7

Such a machine would violate the laws of physics. The answer is emphatically NO!. Lots of folks keep trying though.

Answer 8

I think magnets are used because changes in the B fields produce electricity. This is used by electric companies to make energy, and yeah less energy is inputed than it outputs.

Answer 9

A machine puts out only what you put it. It cannot put out more. That's why 100% efficiency is said to be impossible.

Answer 10

Impossible. Conservation of energy - one of the most fundamental laws of physics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy