The X1300 is a lower-end card than the other two- if you look at any overall roundup of video cards, the X1300 is never discussed, it's below the cutoff point for gamers.
Keep in mind that ATI's X1950 line competes against Nvidia's 7900 series (and the matchups continue down the line) but you almost never get below the X1650.
As the previous poster mentioned, Tom's hardware is a great resource for reviews of video cards, but the best resource to compare them head-to-head is http://www.gpureview.com
Below I've linked direct comparisons of the cards you mentioned (as you can see, the X1300 doesn't even compare well to the cheaper GS models, let alone the GT's) and included the "best video cards for the money" list from Tom's hardware. Good luck!
2007-05-07 12:42:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by C-Man 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The X1300 Pro is a pretty fast budget card. It has 600mhz core clock and 800mhz memclock. BUT it has ONLY 4 pixel pipelines.
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/ati_radeon_x1300_review/
There is now way it could catch up w/ a 7300GT ddr3 (500/1400mhz, 8pipes) or a 6800 (325/700mhz/256bit,12pipes).
2007-05-07 19:06:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Karz 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I always check out Tom's hardware. Look at your budget, look and the site, purchase it at http://www.newegg.com. If you have any trouble they will fix it!
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/05/01/the_best_gaming_video_cards_for_the_money/index.html
Good luck.
2007-05-07 18:33:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Thomas T 4
·
0⤊
0⤋