I'd have to agree with the second statement.
2007-05-07 11:09:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Beardog 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is a good man, and he is not dimwitted. We just have to many dimwitted people throwing stones at him.
2007-05-07 10:59:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Well if he is so dim-witted, how was he able to fool Hillary and Harry Reed (and a whole lot of other Democrats) into authorizing the war? They keep saying that he tricked them into voting with him.
2007-05-07 10:58:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don't know. But I've heard that the questioner is a really dim--but goodwitted person. It's been said that he has no soul. What do you think?
[Please note: I've just done to the questioner what he has done to GWB. If questioner can do it to GW, why can't I do it to him?]
2007-05-07 11:01:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Delray 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think he believes that what he's doing is right. He sees nothing wrong with sacrificing American lives for corporate profits. So while I find him morally bankrupt, he would never understand my point.
2007-05-07 11:06:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Garth Rocket 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
A great man
2007-05-07 10:59:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I don't think he's dim-witted, but just a poor public speaker.
2007-05-07 11:12:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by mikehunt29 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he's a politician. 'Good' and 'dimwitted' doesn't cut in politics.
Try 'cunning' and 'evil' - though, obviously, not to the same extent as more successful politicians.
2007-05-07 11:00:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
ever hear this old saying ?
"The road to Hell is paved with good intentions"
sounds like bush to me
2007-05-07 11:02:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
He serves the prince of darkness. He is the epitome of evil.
2007-05-07 10:59:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋