What are some ideas to write about, in The Battle of Gettysburg, some important people, how it got started, any ideas will work, also, please give me a link to find, info about it
thank you
2007-05-07
10:00:14
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Josh
6
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ History
i need help with a thesis statement on an essay on the battle of gettysburg, give topics, and important people
thanx
2007-05-07
10:02:21 ·
update #1
In the summer of 1863, Union troops were approaching Vicksburg in the West and threatening to close off Confederate supplies from west of the Mississippi. Realizing that he might not get another chanceto deal the Union a major blow, he decided to strike deep into Union territory. In June1863, WITH MORE THAN 70,000 MEN, Lee crossed the Potomac and charged across Maryland into Pennsylvannia. Hoocker's army marched northward to head off the Confederates. In late June Hoockerresigned his command and was replaced by General George G. Meade. On July 1, 1863 the forces of Lee and Meade clashed at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, in what was to prove THE MOST DECISIVE BATTLE OF THE WAR. The bloody encounter raged on for three days. Although Meade had greater forces, Lee was determined to hold his ground. Union forces took control of Cemetery Ridge, south of gettysburg. Lee's men occupied Seminary Ridge, a mile west of Cemetery Ridge. On July 3, in a desperate attempt to gain a victory, Lee sent a force of 15,000 of the best Confederate soldiers, under the command of General George E. Pickett, in a valiant charge up Cemetery Ridge. Union artillery fire and volleys of musketry shot down the gray-uniformed soldiers ascending the hill, but those who escaped death refused to retreat. Finally, about 100 Confederate soldiers reached the crest. They engaged in fierce hand-to-hand combat with the enemy, and for a brief moment, the Confederate flag flew over Cemetery Ridge. But Union forces closed in and the confederates on the hill were all either killed or captured.
2007-05-07 11:27:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, there are numerous websites about this very bloody three day battle. Some say it was the tide that turned the war.
It's my opinion that it was Lincoln's Gettysburg address some months later that is worth remembering. It was a very short speech that followed a VERY long speech given by Everett in support of the Union position.
Lincoln's short speech was a defining moment that put into clear perspective what this country was/is about. In a huge bit of irony, Lincoln says in his speech that no one will recall what was said here (meaning in Gettysburg) when in fact, his speech became one of the most well-known speeches ever.
Good luck but don't expect someone to do the work for you. Go learn some American history on your own! Just google "Battle of Gettysburg" and get going!
2007-05-07 10:19:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by yankeeteacher 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Gettysburg Battle was an accident of two armies bumping into each other. Lee was invading the north without his eyes (Jeb Stuart's Cavalry) and heard from a spy that the Union army was getting close. His orders were to come together near Cashtown or the crossroads of Gettysburg. At the time, the Army of N. Virginia was spreadout from Harrisburg to south of Chambersburg. He had explicit orders not to engage the enemy until the whole army was in the field.
In the fog of war, however, Heth's Rebel Division moved toward Gettysburg looking for shoes. They ran into a cavalry pickett line under Gen. Buford. Heth brought up his whole division and buford held on until the Union Ist Corp came up.
Both sides brought up their armies piecemeal. On July 1, 1863, the Confederates beat back the Union and took control of Gettysburg and Semetary Ridge. Inexplicably, Gen. Ewell did not follow-up the victory with a charge up Culps Hill and Cemetery Hill. The high ground was therefore left in Union hands and the battle may as well have been decided on the 1st day.
Gen Lee was blamed for not giving specific orders to take the high ground ("if at all practicable" he said). Ewell was no Stonewall Jackson, and it showed.
The second day was almost won by the Rebs, with an assault on the Union left up Little Round top and Devil's Den. Two saviors of the day were Governor Warren who rushed troops to the undefended flank at the last moment and Col Chamberlains famous "fix bayonet" charge that stopped Gen. Hoods Texans from taking the flank. For his day at Little Round Top, (Chamberlain won the Cong. Med. of Honor)
The third day was a total blunder on Lee's part for ordering the sure death of proud Viriginians and North Carolinians, as 12,000 rebs attacked over open ground against entrenched infantry and massed artillery (AKA: Pickett's Charge).
The battle was the South's high water mark in the war, from then on they lost the strategic initiative in the war and were henceforth on the retreat.
2007-05-07 10:27:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The blame for the defeat of Gettysburg falls upon R.E.Lee. The plan became a repeat of a matching plan the 365 days before. that is objectives weren't of a militia nature yet a political nature. that is objectives have been to intimidate and threaten the union physique politic right into a panic in the thought they could yield to the peace talks in Canada. R. E. Lee is consistent with hazard Americas, and maximum actual Confederacy surprising tragic hero, and wonderful usually used, yet i think of he's quite puffed up. He now not had Jackson, "his acceptable arm" and an quite able usually used. He commonly made complicated orders and infrequently wrote down training. In a time the place orders have been exceeded from runner to runner this extra very much of misunderstanding and pass over interpretation. All it is very obtrusive at Gettysburg. The Stuarts accomplice cavalry became engaged with a stable bite of the unions cavalry, so i don't think of his presence could have made a distinction. The Union had extra cavalry and have been maximum folk not out looking Stuart they could have given the Union military extra intel. Stuarts stream did confuse the union military for the union theory Stuart became screening the accomplice military and did not comprehend this mistake until eventually the smacked into them at Gettysburg. Lee is purely in charge, it became a bad plan, performed poorly, uncoordinated without available objective for the accomplice military. The components and troops lost for the duration of the conflict could have been extra perfect used sent to alleviate Vicksburg and counter the spiliting of the Confederacy. yet returned yet another one among Lee's faults he could desire to not see previous the protection of Virginia. The accomplice military had no wish of destroying the union military in the open feild, and only the bungling of a gaggle of incompitent union generals prevented an early defeat of the confederacy.
2016-10-15 01:02:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
see if you can find a copy of "The Battle of Gettysburg"by Frank Aretas Haskell.he was the aid-de-camp of general George Gibbon commander of the iron brigade.this account of the battle is a letter by Haskell to his brother shortly after the battle.the letter was not intended for publication and has harsh criticism of some officers and men of the union army.have read this many times over the past thirty years and still find it a great read.one thing it does make clear is that it all happened by mistake.it wasn't planned or expected by either side.they just bumped into one another
2007-05-07 13:05:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by john b 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rent a copy of the Gettysburg the movie by Turner. It was filmed on the actual battlefield and is for the most part accurate
2007-05-07 10:11:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hecaeta 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickett's_Charge
2007-05-07 10:08:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mitchell 4
·
0⤊
0⤋