2007-05-07 08:08:33 · 6 answers · asked by Land Warrior 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Mathematics
Parts of it can be expressed in terms of mathematical equations. But parts of cannot be... at least not with reliability.
For example, the paths of solid bodies can be mathematically determined. Because of the reliability of these equations, planets have been discovered where, before, they were not know to exist.. But the actions of people cannot.
To come up with a single equation to explain everything... so that you could change the value of a variable and be sure the result would be accurate... No. It would be interesting to change the variable that included the existence of Hitler, or Julius Ceaser, or of humanity, and see the affect on reality as we know it.
Granted these incidents, perhaps the development of the planet Earth itself, are probably insignificant in the universal equation. If the Earth disappeared, stars a thousand light years away would go on shining.
2007-05-07 08:36:06 · answer #1 · answered by gugliamo00 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you've 2 solutions! definite and No. NO: because there isn't any equation at this very second. definite: which has a nil.000001% of danger, in hassle-free words once you get to understand a minimum of two aspects that you'll evaluate by figures. i desire you locate out about relativity. So, in almost we is surely no longer in a position to discover it earlier the best of this international. That because TIME concerns. we do not understand how vast it became, on the birthday of the milky way. i understand, there isn't any birthday for that, yet enable's say hypothetically. In a nutshell we haven't got any such project that we may be able to describe the universe quite to the different. so a ideas as all of us understand it really is increasing and each and each and every of the clusters(vast call constellations) pass quite to some direction. we will be acceptable on that, yet howdy,.. who's conscious!
2016-11-26 00:57:35 · answer #2 · answered by louria 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you have two answers! Yes and No.
NO: because there is no equation at this very moment.
YES: which has a 0.000001% of probability, only when you get to know at least 2 factors that you can COMPARE by figures. I hope you know about relativity. So, in practically we will not be able to find it before the end of this world. That because TIME matters.
we don't know how big it was, on the birthday of the milky way. I know, there is no birthday for that, but let's say hypothetically.
In a nutshell we have no such thing that we can describe the universe relatively to any other.
as far as we know it is expanding and all the clusters(star constellations) move relatively to some direction. we might be right on that, but hey,.. who knows!
2007-05-07 08:28:25 · answer #3 · answered by Universalshowdown 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The complexity of the system is far beyond the level of our mathematics at this point
2007-05-07 08:15:47 · answer #4 · answered by dogsafire 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The answer to this is unknown at this point in time. There are many physicists out there who would love to know that... many working on it or related questions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_unification_theory
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1511/is_11_20/ai_57042534
2007-05-07 08:35:10 · answer #5 · answered by itsakitty 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
read 'a breif history of time' by stephen hawkings, you'll get something that might interest you.
2007-05-07 08:20:44 · answer #6 · answered by anshul 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋